I've done like 3-4 ACT practice tests...I'm not improving...

<p>Why? I'm only at a 31 or so right now.</p>

<p>b/c that is how smart you are... if you had the same set of questions every single time then u would improve...</p>

<p>Why Am I So Stupid???</p>

<p>Do you mean this is probably the Maximum Level I can achieve???</p>

<p>AND THIS IS THE ACT! IT'S CURRICULUM BASED.
I've scored my MAX 32. and that's it. </p>

<p>the rest...29 to 31..</p>

<p>i want to raise my ACT score, i dont know *** I can do anymore. this is my 4th test, and i'm still missing just as much. the weird thing is, it's all in random places. it's not a specific "category" that I have trouble in.</p>

<p>OMG WhaTF
i got a 29 in the PR reading section, a 21 in the barrons reading section</p>

<p>Wow, does that mean Barron's is more realistic? Please, someone confirm that Barron's or PR is better as far as being like the real thing. I don't wanna end up on the ACTs like what happened on the SATs for me - the Cambridge book I bought trained me on math problems that weren't anything like what was on the REAL THING! OMG! Please help! Thanks! :D</p>

<p>are you looking at what you got wrong and learning why you got it wrong?<br>
if you're just using practice tests, i'd reccomend getting a guide book and reading it.</p>

<p>Yeah, don't think that constantly taking practice tests will help. From my experiences, the ACT is extremely repetitive in question choice (especially in math). Look at what you got wrong and learn from it.</p>

<p>-And I think Barrons is a lot harder, although I don't know for sure.</p>

<p>yea, i always read the back explanations...
but still, i cant seem to "think" like they do.
they think weird. ESPECIALLY in the reading section</p>

<p>because it's pure interpretation sometimes.
and i cant catch on to their interpretation</p>

<p>somebody please AIM me...i need serious guidance. thanks</p>