<p>The question was oil to gas ratio. @glasses, your answer does work because it should be 5<x<8</p>
<p>Ok do you guys remember if the question said no less than 1/8th and no more than 1/5th? That would make it inclusive i believe. I remember doing this question like 5 times because I wasn’t sure if it was over the total or just over the gasoline. So it should be 5<=x<=8 right?</p>
<p>I got the answer to be exactly 5. would that work?</p>
<p>Let me correct myself. 5<=x<=8. No less and no more means that they are inclusive.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember which answer choice 16pie was for the 2 circle one</p>
<p>16pi is correct for the 2 circle with a diamond.</p>
<p>and does anyone know what the answer was to the question where one of the wrong answers was labyrinthian</p>
<p>ya but was it answer choice B or D</p>
<p>@nickbay: answer was something like execrate?</p>
<p>ya i got that, was it B for 16pie</p>
<p>what did u put for the measure of angle x in the trapezoid?</p>
<p>What did you put for the measurement of angle x in the trapezoid?</p>
<p>79 degrees. I forgot a simple geometry rule so I ended up solving for all the angles… ***</p>
<p>i thought it was supposed to be 81 because the angles were supposed to be supplementary</p>
<p>I think the theorem is that if there are 2 parallel lines, the corresponding angles are equal.</p>
<p>ya but the angles of the trapezoid are suplementary I am pretty sure</p>
<p>If they were supplementary it still wouldn’t be 81, it would be 101</p>
<p>dangit,so collegehopeful do you remember what answer choice 16 pie was?</p>
<p>The answer can’t be 101. I put 101 at first but then realized the quadrilateral was over 360.</p>
<p>@nickbay, the answer was execrable, about the book that was so abominable</p>