<p>How'd everyone do? I thought parts of it were tricky.</p>
<p>Alll I have to say is: a lot of D’s, and stupid patterns. Whoever makes the Latin test is sadistic, no joke. </p>
<p>Wasn’t too bad though</p>
<p>no, not bad at all! There were a couple for the comprehension that I skipped and went back to, but when I returned I was able to figure them out.</p>
<p>I actually thought it was kinda hard. And yeah I noticed a lot of weird patterns too. I think I had like BABABA one time and a lot of Ds and Bs.</p>
<p>A lotttttt of Ds. I had BABABA also.</p>
<p>Bleh, feels mediocre</p>
<p>Anyone remember any answers? I didn’t think it was that bad.
I believe for the scansion question near the end I got Spondee-Dactyl-Spondee-Spondee. I also said Flavius was “seen among the enemy”, that the enemy attacked with a few horsemen…i dont remember much else.</p>
<p>The the scansion I got --| – | – | - ~~, which is A
Hoping that’s right…the teacher never taught us that, EVER and she was like, oh so it’s super simple and my boyfriend had to teach me the night before. It’s not too bad still I could have had longer time to digest the new info…</p>
<p>Yeah, I had those too.</p>
<p>Oh so there was this type of question “what determins the case of ___?” and I was like, ***??? What do you mean what determines the case of another word…don’t you just recognize it. So for one of them I chose aliquid, and the other the verb.</p>
<p>I said that the main guy (Lavinius? I forget) was ambushed (Subito…ex something or rather), not that the enemy attacked with a few horsemen.</p>
<p>Got the same for the scanning - I think it was C - and also said that Flavius was seen among the enemy.</p>
<p>Anyone remember the question about the mother giving horses to the sons? Did you put “vehantur”?</p>
<p>aliquid and the verb were both the right answers, I’m pretty sure.</p>
<p>for the vehantur one, i thought that was a relative clause of purpose, so i chose, in reference to sequence of tenses, “veherentur” (imperfect) since the main introductory part was “dedit” (perfect)</p>
<p>i got something like --|-vv|–|-- cause there was an elision somewhere… in the beginning of that line (dactylic hex.)</p>
<p>Oh, you’re so right. Damn.</p>
<p>and two things i thought were tricky. “Ut non” was one of the answers, not “ne” (result clause) and “that you do dare…”(Ne…vereor) for the fear clause</p>
<p>Yeah, I got ut non (it was A) and “that you dare”</p>
<p>Now I’m really nervous. Anyone have an idea of the curve?</p>
<p>yes I got the fear clauses with the “that you dare”. tricky tricky fear clause. I also got tango for the derivative one, aliquid for the case one. I said ipsa meant “that”. For the lumina one, I said something about the “light leaving your eyes”. Anyone remember others?</p>
<p>I also got “seem” for one of the answers.</p>
<p>I got all that except “abstulerant oculi lumina nostra tui.” i picked the longest one, but in retrospect, I think that I’m wrong. </p>
<p>[A</a> web of fantasies: gaze, image, and … - Google Book Search](<a href=“A Web of Fantasies: Gaze, Image, and Gender in Ovid's Metamorphoses - Patricia B. Salzman-Mitchell - Google Books”>A Web of Fantasies: Gaze, Image, and Gender in Ovid's Metamorphoses - Patricia B. Salzman-Mitchell - Google Books)</p>
<p>translation for that passage</p>
<p>lumina one I said something like “your eyes had taken mine” </p>
<p>got “tango” and “seem” also. I don’t think I put ipsa as “that”…but I don’t really remember. </p>
<p>Btw, here is some info I found in another thread:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Not sure if it’s reliable or not; seems too good to be true.</p>
<p>yea it does seem too good to be true, but then again, its my first time taking Latin Sat II. So, we’ll see :)</p>
<p>Had anyone read any of those passages before? I had read the anger one before, and I had read a translation of the passage about the fire.</p>