<p>Gah, for the grandfather passage I put that she appreciated his “talk of the present”…</p>
<p>sqdwfe13: while I remember seeing all of those words, I don’t remember ever picking one of them.</p>
<p>jollybjolly: I put all the vocab. I didn’t put that for the main idea…</p>
<p>also, did one of the vocab answers start with the letters “adj…” i can’t remember the exact word…</p>
<p>I thought the culpability one was wrong. I got alibi and something else.</p>
<p>jollybjolly: adjudicious?</p>
<p>SQD, I am certainly apoplectic, not enervated, at your refusal to wait for the embargo to be lifted. Jolly, you are complicit in this crime.</p>
<p>so this cr killed me…=[</p>
<p>science: did you put the “examines a psychological experiment” or something</p>
<p>Jolly, sorry to burst your bubble, I agree with sqd…</p>
<p>how is it an alibi, this is complicity right?</p>
<p>Is discussing specifics still proscribed? I don’t know if I’ll be able to exonerate myself from not studying some of those words, gahhhh.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Lol the embargo has been lifted…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yup. 10char</p>
<p>Indicted for doesn’t make logical sense^^^</p>
<p>@Jolly</p>
<p>Ohhh lol.</p>
<p>Ok so grandfather talks about present</p>
<p>Wait, has the embargo been lifted? Whoops, my bad if it hasn’t…
I just saw the topic title in the sticky which made me think it has been lifted…:
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/642149-embargo-sat-discussion-lifted.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/642149-embargo-sat-discussion-lifted.html</a></p>
<p>Damn, I got a lot of the vocab wrong…</p>
<p>I don’t think alibi was right. I had that down first… but the defendant was connected to the crime, meaning they were complicit and then indicted (or something that means that lmao, I forgot the word) for it.</p>
<p>oopooooooooooops.</p>
<p>@Jolly again</p>
<p>SEE! TOLD YA!</p>
<p>@NewAccount</p>
<p>No it was not.</p>