<p>I am almost positive they were the same. Thats why I put something else. But chances are that’s right (I was overthinking it).</p>
<p>Can anyone recall all 5 answer choices from the dichotomy question?</p>
<p>A. Established by a famous study
B. Hard to experiment
C. I think it was like reconcile them
D. Dont remember.
E. Dont remember</p>
<p>I wish I could. That was the one question in which I picked “hard to experiment” right away, I didn’t think about the other choices so I don’t remember them. I really hope I got it correct, and also that Marjerina had the same choice and thus got it right as well.</p>
<p>@ugaboga, it didnt say hard to experiment, it said the experiments were inconclusive, which makes sense because none of the experiments fully supported a single part of the dichotomy</p>
<p>that argentinian guy who read to the author
the vocab answer of “apprehend” meant anticipate, i’m very sure, but ppl keep saying it was perceive
i mean if you determine which book to read, when to stop, when to comment, are you perceiving the “scenery” the driver drives through or are you anticipating it?</p>
<p>anticipate: to act in<em>advance of; deal with ahead</em>of*time
vs.
perceive: to become conscious of; become aware of through the senses</p>
<p>i got some questions on the zoo thing wrong
the “curiosities for display” and “savvy” were correct
i also put tenacious instead of apoplectic
and i mite have not put “watershed movement”
so thats 4x so far for the reading
I probably made some silly mistakes here and there so its probably 5-8x</p>
<p>And for the “condition” question, what did you all put? Because the definition of an experimental condition is the treatment being imposed on the patients. So I put down like amount of practice or something to that effect.</p>
<p>Oh, and I’m pretty sure the dichotomy question asked how the “passage as a whole” suggested the answer</p>
<p>notreal-
The referenced lines were at the part that was metaphorical. Something about going down roads, and how he had little control over the direction and whatnot-implied all he could do was sit back and watch.</p>
<p>Yea, I skipped it and did it at the last minute. So you’re probably right.</p>
<p>No, that was the driver, the person who was reading to him, who could only sit back and watch. He said the author was the one who determined the scenery. The question was asking about the author, not the driver.</p>
<p>According to dictionary.com:
anticipate:
1.
to realize beforehand; foretaste or foresee: to anticipate pleasure.
2.
to expect; look forward to; be sure of: to anticipate a favorable decision.
3.
to perform (an action) before another has had time to act.
4.
to answer (a question), obey (a command), or satisfy (a request) before it is made: He anticipated each of my orders.
5.
to nullify, prevent, or forestall by taking countermeasures in advance: to anticipate a military attack.
6.
to consider or mention before the proper time: to anticipate more difficult questions.
7.
to be before (another) in doing, thinking, achieving, etc.: Many modern inventions were anticipated by Leonardo da Vinci.</p>
<p>perceive:
1.
to become aware of, know, or identify by means of the senses: I perceived an object looming through the mist.
2.
to recognize, discern, envision, or understand: I perceive a note of sarcasm in your voice. This is a nice idea but I perceive difficulties in putting it into practice.</p>
<p>Ah I think I remember a little better about the dichotomy question now. I think it said “It was hard to prove experimentally.” Does this make more sense to all your memories?</p>
<p>Exactly, as he was the reader, he was only able to perceive what was the scenery.
I thought about anticipate, but what was there for him to anticipate?</p>
<p>Does anyone remember one of the answer choices for the dichotomy one saying something about two seemingly different ideas?</p>
<p>^I put that it reconciles them.</p>
<p>Wait, was the choice that two seemingly different ideas were reconciled?</p>
<p>I think so.</p>
<p>Yes that was the answer choice. I didn’t put that, however. Again I may be wrong.</p>
<p>@goldysocks, the context of apprehend was:
“I was the driver, but the scene around us was his to apprehend”
something along those lines
i doesn’t make sense if the author also perceives</p>
<p>I remember now! I definitely put that one.</p>
<p>My reasoning was that towards the end of the passage, the author was talking about how the two different ideas were somewhat connected. For example, he said that even though practice makes people “world class” performers, why can some people never improve with a great deal of practice? And why do some people get more out of their practice sessions than others? So the two ideas, though different at first consideration, are actually connected.</p>
<p>Wait. For the question about the talent passage that asked for it’s structure, why’d you all put compromise? I put something about him referencing specific studies which he clearly does…</p>