<p>Eagles: I somewhat remember the coordinates being (-6,0) and (2,6) but I could be wrong.</p>
<p>Yes, I just wrote it out and those are the correct points. I remember I created a triangle out of it so I wouldn’t have to mess up by using the distance formula, and it was a 6,8,10 triangle, 10 being the diameter.</p>
<p>You positive on that Mood? Because I remember reading the question like 3 times to make sure I got the rows and columns right… Did I really pull that big of a fail?</p>
<p>any one care to tell me what these scores would be:
Hoping for: -3 MC and 1G (no skipped questions)
MAX wrong: 6 MC and 1G(no skipped questions)</p>
<p>Can’t say I’m positive since my reason for getting it wrong was indeed due to misreading (putting down how many remain instead of how many were taken away) so it may have been the other way. </p>
<p>But others confirmed that was the way it was written so I guess it breaks down to your word against theirs (since I’m in no position to make claims about this question) and no one can really be sure anymore what was right.</p>
<p>also does any one remember seeing a probability answer that was 5/something (maybe 8). i might be imaging this answer choice for the french students problem or was this an answer choice? anyone remember?</p>
<p>I’m sure the triangle/pentagon isn’t experimental as I had that question and my experimental section wasn’t math, it was writing.</p>
<p>Unless the experimental math had a different but coincidentally similar sounding question which may be possible. But the 7a/9 is not experimental.</p>
<p>For the chair prob, it is was 22. All you had to do was set up areas of the original rectangle of chairs (6<em>12=72) and subtract the new area (5</em>10=50) 72 chairs-50 chairs=22 chairs removed!</p>
<p>So JWC you are sure it was remove 2 rows and 1 column? Because I thought it was 1 row and 2 columns meaning 72 - (11x4) = 28?</p>
<p>I likely read it wrong… but that is lame of CB to put an answer that you would get from mixing up the rows and columns… I knew how to do the damn problem…</p>