<p>^ Thank goodness XD</p>
<p>Huh. Thus far I still stand at an 800 M… which is interesting because at the beginning of the test I discovered that my TI-83 had crashed. But I just thought “oh well” and did everything by hand. Looks like it worked out :p</p>
<p>I barely used my calculator at all maybe for a few number crunches I did to save a few seconds… As of now I think I have an 800 as well as long as I didn’t do anything stupid like bubble in a wrong answer by accident.</p>
<p>Are there any fill-ins missing from the list?</p>
<p>Same fledgling, still you’re beating me at CR and writing. Maybe if I got reallly lucky, I could get a 2400. I’m aiming for a 2300+, which I think is doable.</p>
<p>What’s my score going to be probably if I missed one MC?</p>
<p>770 or 780. It sucks that 1 question brings you down 30 points (btw, it will probably be 770).</p>
<p>multiple by 2 subtract by 1 = 66???</p>
<p>i dont remember this question, guys! im freaking out!</p>
<p>can someone elaborate on it please~??</p>
<p>4,6,10,18…
What is the 6th term in the sequence. Sequence is 2(n-1) which is given.</p>
<p>nvm didnt see above posts</p>
<p>thanks, ugaboga232</p>
<p>now i remember ^_^~</p>
<p>Was this one experimental?</p>
<p>{2,4,6,8,10}
Chances of picking a number greater than 6?
Answer 2/5</p>
<p>Something along those lines…</p>
<p>^ I don’t recall seeing that one (then again, my memory could just be bad). Maybe it really was experimental.</p>
<p>Probably experimental. I don’t remember it at all.</p>
<p>I am pretty sure you guys have already talked about this (I’m not going to read through 65 pages), but was the telephone question experimental?</p>
<p>No it was part of the test.</p>
<p>What was the multiply by 2 subtract by 1 question?</p>
<p>I remember a question where there were two triangles overlapping each other. You were given three lengths of 8 each and one length of 4, and you had to find a smaller length. It’s hard to explain but a picture would make it much clearer. Does anyone remember this? I omitted it and would be happy if it was experimental.</p>
<p>dont remember seeing that question so it’s probably the experimental section</p>
<p>@domcabano I dont believe I had that, but that might be my memory.</p>