<p>There was a question about the dark matter passage that went something like, “The author suggests that dark matter is all of the following except:” and two of the answer choices were unverifiable and pervasive. I put that dark matter is not unverifiable, does anyone remember what the answer was for that one?</p>
<p>@Eggyolk lolol i hate waiting though XD but you’re right haha. 3 weeks!
@juju76567 Math will be the same, if not harsher so like -1 is a 780. Writing -1 780, CR -3 780? no idea lolol</p>
<p>@hellousername123 The question with 3 squares said that x = 2y so that means x+x+y = 360. so 2y + 2y +y= 360</p>
<p>so 5y=360 and y=72 and x=2y=144 don’t know how you got 18</p>
<p>@sleepdeprived4 i put unverifiable for that one </p>
<p>@Eggyolk No, the answer was definitely 36… x + x + y was not equal to 360.</p>
<p>I think it was for the publicity double passage, what did you guys put for the last question? Some answers were melodramatic and satirical. </p>
<p>For the Dark Matter passage did anyone put some thing like
“stars are less likely to be made of exotic materials that galaxies”???</p>
<p>@Eggyolk that’s what I got at first, but then I realized that the three squares contributed as well. Each corner of the square = 90 degrees, so it’s 2x + y + 3(90) = 360. And since x=2y, x=36</p>
<p>@blubrrybanana22 If that was the question about Passage 1’s tone as compared to that of Passage 2, the answer was balanced.</p>
<p>@sleepdeprived4 Please Explain… It was squares with the x and y being the angles in between the squares. Those angles make a full circle if you draw a curved line through them.</p>
<p>The angles are kind of like those in the picture just in different sizes. <a href=“http://www.mathsisfun.com/images/angle360.gif”>http://www.mathsisfun.com/images/angle360.gif</a></p>
<p>There 2 x’s and 1 y so x+x+y=360</p>
<p>Edit: oh didn’t see that… thanks @loves2ride I guess that’s a wrong one for me. Or was it a grid-in?</p>
<p>@sleepdeprived4 thats what I put too haha</p>
<p>@sleepdeprived4 crap I think I read it as passage 2’s tone compared to passage 1’s</p>
<p>@Eggyolk I’m not positive, but I think you’re forgetting about the squares – it would be 90(3) + x + x + x/2 = 360, and then solve for x.</p>
<p>@sleepdeprived4 Yeah @loves2ride explained. My bad 
was it a grid-in?</p>
<p>@blubrrybanana22 I don’t remember the exact question, but I know the answer was definitely balanced. This is from the google doc re that question:</p>
<p>Was the answer that Passage 2 critiqued a claim in Passage 1? x1
Passage 1 was more balanced. Passage 2 only had one opinion. agree x18 NO! the answer was pssge 2 critiqued a claim because he crtizies the idealogy that we have “common sense” towards right of publicity
Passage 1 was more balanced because it took both viewpoints into consideration. Passage 2 just attacked the viewpoint of Passage 1.</p>
<p>@Eggyolk I think it was, so at least you don’t get the 1/4 point off! :)</p>
<p>Ugghhh… part of why I hate these threads is the stress and frustration lol</p>
<p>@sleepdeprived4 I don’t think it’s the same question…but I’m not sure. I think the question you’re referring to was the first one?</p>
<p>@sleepdeprived4 that’s what I put</p>
<p>Aghhhhhhhhhh 2 wrong in math now I can only hope for as generous a curve as march (770= -2) but this is unlikely :(( </p>