***June 2014 SAT (US ONLY)***

<p>Ok for the last writing question I clearly remember their being no as…as parallel. I thought it sounded better with the than, so I picked “than it had.” </p>

<p>@sleepdeprived4‌ What was the question for that one? Is it the relationship one?</p>

<p>Edit: the question for the balanced one </p>

<p>and for anyone who thinks it was untenable it was definitely incoherent </p>

<p>@underbiz101‌ there was definitely an as…as answer</p>

<p>I don’t remember the exact question, just that it asked something about the tone of Passage 1 as compared to Passage 2, and that the answer choices included satirical and some other adjectives, but the answer was balanced. Hope this helps!</p>

<p>Does anyone know the long passage right before the Immigrant-moving-to-NYC passage? </p>

<p>@satletsgo‌ which passage was the “untenable” question for?</p>

<p>@sleepdeprived4‌ yup… that’s what I got for the tone one. I am so worried about my CR and W scores :(</p>

<p>Don’t want to take the SAT again ^:)^ </p>

<p>@humbugs‌ the “untenable” one was for the bear extinction I believe </p>

<p>I feel like the answer could be argued for “incoherent” or “untenable.”</p>

<p>@blubrrybanana22‌ @satletsgo‌ i put “untenable.” Untenable means “not able to be defended against objection.” incoherent means not understandable </p>

<p>Well, the google docs page is going to ■■■■…</p>

<p>In the passage about publicity, what did you guys put for “both passages were about what”?
and I put that both were about the “scholarly reviews of publicity” because passage 1 showed a balanced view of how different scholars have different views about publicity, but Passage 2 talked about how the scholars are basing their ideas on “common sense” without justification. The other answer about publicity of celebrities was too obvious and the main point of the passages were not about the publicity of celebrities but mostly about how different scholars think without a justification. </p>

<p>Oh I put the publicity of celebrities lol</p>

<p>^ Same, and I thought that both passages were all about the publicity rights of celebrities. The authors used the opinions of scholars to advance their arguments, but everything was still principally about publicity rights.</p>

<p>Did anyone else have a math experimental section? One of them seemed really hard, I think the second one with 20 questions in it. It had problems about concert ticket prices I /think/ and I’m almost positive there was one about a bar in a window to prop it open…do you think that was the experimental section? </p>

<p>I had experimental math also</p>

<p>i dont remember concert ticket prices tho</p>

<p>@SilverSmart Does that mean it was most likely experimental, or that I could be remembering wrong? Sorry, this was my first time</p>

<p>@sleepdeprived4 @spiritkoi @SAT1234567890 I put how both passages were concerned about how scholars viewed publicity of celebrities. I originally picked publicity of celebrities but then I changed it to how scholars viewed publicity of celebrities because in both passages, they are both talking about how scholars view publicity of celebrities but idk I might be wrong</p>