<p>@mizejonathan17 i put scholarly justification/views. The passages talked about the ethics and societal ramifications of publicity rights, not just the celebrities</p>
<p>Oh thank god! 800 is still in the picture</p>
<p>What did you guys put for the incoherent/untenable one?
I put incoherent because the author didn’t explicitly say that there was no way whoever said whatever could defend their case, just that it didn’t quite make sense.</p>
<p>That choice seemed too specific for me but idk. We’ll see on the 26th </p>
<p>That’s the one I missed. I put disingenuous for some reason. I saw the word dubious in the passage and falsely connected that with lying/deception</p>
<p>Incoherent has to do with illegibility. Untenable means hard to prove which I think is the answer</p>
<p>So what do you think the final answer is?</p>
<p>I totally bombed cr oh well</p>
<p>Also, does anyone remember the Dark Matter one with the answer choices “technological innovations bring up questions and also solve them” and “a certain degree of intuition as well as empirical evidence is needed”. I also put the latter for this one. The enigma of dark matter isn’t solved yet, so I didn’t think the former fit very well
@LOLBeast1 definitely untenable </p>
<p>I thought that too @Jellybae but I looked up “incoherent” on google and a definition is…(of an ideology, policy, or system) internally inconsistent; illogical. This is why I do not know which one is right.</p>
<p>I think the latter said “science relies just as much on intuition as it does on empirical evidence” I narrowed it down to those two as well but chose the technology one because the passage showed how technology progressed over time in helping us think of dark matter but it also didn’t provide any solid proof. The intuition one was just too far fetched to me because it wasn’t really supported in the passage. But idk. Cr isn’t my strong suit </p>
<p>The hardest thing about the cr this time around wasnt the passages or the questions but the answer choices… There were a lot more traps on this one than in march :|</p>
<p>@LOLBeast1 i think it was untenable because it didn’t stand up to the objection that the author made… who knows though </p>
<p>Sigh, I hope that the curve will be super nice to us, since everyone is saying it was harder than March CR and the curve for March was -2 = 800</p>
<p>If I missed 4 Math mc’s and omitted 0 (-5 Raw), what do you think I will get? 710? </p>
<p>Well based on Google docs looks like I got
CR 5 wrong 3 ommited. Writing 4 wrong 1 ommited and math 4 wrong 3 ommited. That’s kind of depressing. </p>
<p>I put “inexplicable” for that one and so did my friends that I was taking it with. Is there any chance that is right? :P</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the question about “social structure”? Or was that the “perpetuate a social order” question?</p>
<p>@LOLBeast1 Most people on the googledocs (page 23) say it is “perpetuate a social order.”</p>
<p>@mizejonathan17 I think it was “celebrity publicity rights,” simply because that was what both passages focused on.</p>
<p>Granted, “scholarly justification/views” could also be correct… damnit, not that I rethink the 2 both seem correct >_></p>