<p>math I wrong is 790 then 770 then 760 then 740/730 nd then 710/700</p>
<p>when do we find out what the exper. sec was</p>
<p>in a week? I think</p>
<p>best bet...don't stress after tmrw and you'll get the best possible scores...(just a myth of mine)...I stressed always excpet for my january SAT and I did pretty welll back then.</p>
<p>do you think CB will be more lenient in the amth section curves?</p>
<p>nope...THOSE BASTARDS...I got 5 wrong in OLD SAT in jan. and I got a 740 in math.</p>
<p>any speculation?</p>
<p>now 5 wrong is a 700 or 710 if they are generous</p>
<p>Kristin - 32 is what I got, and I'm fairly confident. Did you use tangent to find the two lengths and then just add?</p>
<p>So is the math curve harder in the New SATs than it was in the old?</p>
<p>yeah it's a hell of a lot harder. like merudh123 said, 5 wrong 740 on the old one as compared to 3 wrong 730 on the new one</p>
<p>yea kristin, the answer was 32</p>
<p>a lot of these questions weren't even on my sat test...</p>
<p>Ive got 700 in May with 7 wrong</p>
<p>zero i think we had the same test. did you have writing experimental with CR passages about travelling alone, chinese calligraphy, and human behavior? i know we had a similar math section for sure</p>
<p>what did people get for th eproblem that asked u to solve for the initial term in the arithmetic series</p>
<p>i think i got 7</p>
<p>yeah i had those CR passages, which one do you think is the writing experimental section? 2 or 5</p>
<p>i think 2 is the expermentail (i hope)</p>
<p>the curve isn't as harsh as you all say it is. if you miss 7, you got a 700. not that bad.</p>
<p>I hope 2 too</p>