<p>for both readiing and english? a 32-33?</p>
<p>There has been -1 = 36 im pretty sure. My friend who got 3 35’s says so at least haha</p>
<p>A 31.5? With a curve maybe a 33 (if it is +2)</p>
<p>Haha, I hope they have some generous curves. Than again, it is curved on how hard the ACT thinks it is, regardless of debatable questions.</p>
<p>EDIT: Reading and Math >.<</p>
<p>^for what? english or reading? lol this is confusing</p>
<p>So did we come up with a consensus on the contradictory vs. anticlimactic question?</p>
<p>Yeah, it’s undermine (I’d laugh if I did put anti-climatic and I’ve been ragging on that answer).</p>
<p>I just quit debating and assumed you guys were right; it was anticlimactic (not that i agree with it or anything :))</p>
<p>It undermines the author’s previous sentence.</p>
<p>
I think 32 for English and 31 for reading (probably 33 if there is a +2 curve).</p>
<p>so you do think it is undermining?
then scratch that.
How is a -4 on English then?</p>
<p>Probably a 32? I’m totally judging off the way my book grades the scores, then -1 for a more appropriate score. #right/#of questions *36</p>
<p>^ That is the worst possible way to calculate lol, that doesn’t even take into account the curves.</p>
<p>a 33 im assuming?
so then ill have 33, 31, 36, and for science it’s -3, at the least.</p>
<p>Updated and more accurate predictions:</p>
<p>Reading: 34
Math: 35
English: 35
Science: 36</p>
<p>Composite: 35. This whould be amazing considering I only have a 2100 SAT and expecting around 2200 for June SAT.</p>
<p>How sure are you guys about undermining the paragraph? This would come as a shock to me, because I honestly do not remember reading anything about the sounds of the auroras (and also because I got a 36 on English the last time I took the ACT).</p>
<p>There is definitely no consensus.</p>
<p>I still dont get why anticlimactic + Weak ending is wrong…but okay. w/e.</p>
<p>It’s not wrong haha omg. I’m so positive anticlimactic is right.</p>
<p>what would -3 on science be FOR THIS TEST you think?</p>