<p>The than or then one was than right?</p>
<p>And whatabout the </p>
<p>Full clause beginning with even, who was x x x . Was it a semicolon or comma?</p>
<p>@Mabs, how many times have you taken the ACT. And it was necessary because they mentioned that word twice more in the passage, and without understanding it, the passage was not as persuasive.</p>
<p>how much does the ESSAY affect the ENGLISH Score?</p>
<p>
Does anyone know the answer to this for sure? So many conflicting answers that put up a good argument. :p</p>
<p>^ i confirm that answer.</p>
<p>Wait so your saying shimmering colored lights and not shimmering, colored lights?</p>
<p>shimmering, colored lights</p>
<p>that’s what im saying.
You only use a comma when you can replace the comma with “and”
You can say shimmering and colored lights</p>
<p>I have no idea what I chose. This is killing me.</p>
<p>For the “amphora” question I put that it was unnecessary…ancient times.</p>
<p>was the answer</p>
<p>“that”
or
“on which”</p>
<p>“On that” was the answer.</p>
<p>it was “on what” no doubt in my mind…</p>
<p>“On that” was the answer. </p>
<p>i think it was “on what”. There was no “on that” as an option. It was just “that”</p>
<p>Oh, right, that’s what I meant! :O</p>
<p>yup… It was definitly “on what” there was “on what”, “that”, “on which” and one othe option that made no sense.</p>
<p>I thought “on what” sounded weird</p>
<p>@Mabs…again, how many times have you taken the ACT?</p>
<p>Amphora was necessary to define unfamiliar word.</p>
<p>I put shimmering, colored lights.
Based on the grammar rules I’m reading, I’m still having trouble deciding if that is true.</p>
<p>^the grammar rule states that if you have two adjectives, as in our case, you can seperate them by a comma ONLY if replacing the comma with a “and” makes sense. In our situation, “and” makes sense; therefore, you must use a comma.</p>
<p>The number of times he took it shouldn’t matter. This was my first time and I’m looking at at least a 35.</p>