<p>Am I the only one that thinks this was a really hard test? I thought CR was unreasonably hard. I took 6 actual S.A.T tests and got 800's in CR on them. This test I already know I have 7 MC wrong. I thought the writing was harder than usual but not horrible. The math was alright. I was just careless.</p>
<p>i though this test was fairly easier than the March one that I took. Anyone else think so? I thought the math was easy, CR was err.. okay.. writing was alright too. what about the May testing?</p>
<p>math was easy
CR was hard for me
writing was easy to medium</p>
<p>i took the Dec 2006 test, and i thought
it was easier, but still hard for me T.T</p>
<p>agreed with gandhi :D</p>
<p>math and writing will probably be the usual brutal curves</p>
<p>Do you guys think CR will be generous? I honestly don't think it was THAT bad. Easier than march in my opinion, albeit not by much. You think -2 will still be 800?</p>
<p>Math = Easy
CR = Medium
Writing = Medium/Easy</p>
<p>Anyway i really don't understand this SAT curve thing...can someone elaborate for me?</p>
<p>the math was far easier than march... i only came across a few tricky questions where usually the last few in the section always take me a while to figure out. the critical read sucked just as much as the one in march. the passages seemed more interesting, but the questions and the voabulary were just as challenging. the writing section, in my opinion, was easier than march, although not by too much. i dont take many practice tests, so the march test is the only thing i can really use as an indicator to measure the may tests difficulty level.</p>
<p>Was math easier on this June 07 test or May 5th 07 test?</p>
<p>I have a feeling math will have:</p>
<p>54-800
53-800</p>
<p>That one trapezoid question was harder than anything I had on the december SAT, and I got an 800 on the math for that despite having one wrong...</p>
<p>what was the answer for that trapezoid?</p>
<p>18 but I put 16 because I didn't properly visualize it...oh well, I have my 800 from december either way so I won't flip a **** if I get a 790.</p>
<p>I thought math was waaaay harder than the march test. That trapezoid one was the devil. I put down 98 (because i'm stupid) and then figured it out AFTER the test was over....</p>
<p>Is everyone SURE it was 18??? I put 12, but idk? Also someone put 17 cuz you were supposed to put one less than something.</p>
<p>im 100% sure its 18.</p>
<p>yea it definitely is 18, since when u were looking at the picture you could tell the interior angle was 160, so you just do </p>
<p>160n = 180*(n-2)
160n = 180n - 360
n = 18</p>
<p>ye -8 was 690 in march</p>
<p>but...i really wouldnt mind having this curve for june.</p>
<p>lol, I just did "20, 10, 10, 10" until you got to 90, but I stopped at 80 because of overlap, but doing it out later I realized there was no overlap...if you did 20, 10, 10, etc. up to 90 (by summation) you got 8 measures ( I got 7) multipled by 2 and added to the two at the top/bottom to get 18...Damn, let's hope minus 1 is an 800</p>
<p>all I did was draw 80/80/20 triangles</p>
<p>360/20=18</p>
<p>the march sat was especially harsh...
3 wrong CR: 760
1 wrong W, 9 essay: 770
2 wrong math: 760.</p>
<p>i'm hoping the CR curve is a bit more generous... i know i got 1 wrong at least, and i'm still hoping for an 800 (or at least a 780).</p>