<p>O.o What trapezoid problem are we talking about? I don't remember even having that problem... although I vaguely remember using 180(n-2) for something.</p>
<p>oh, wait. Was that the last problem of the SPR?</p>
<p>^yupp...i put 12 :(</p>
<p>Oh that was 18... im 100% positive (though, i def. got that one wrong which sucks because I wanted an 800 on math)</p>
<p>....umm I honestly do not think the curve will be more generous this time around. The math was a joke, writing was simple and criticle reading was very easy with some tricks here and there</p>
<p>Anyone? Was the trapezoid problem the last problem of the SPR?</p>
<p>What is that was the only problem u got wrong? Would u still get an 800?</p>
<p>probably a 780</p>
<p>aquamarine: yes, last grid-in</p>
<p>i thought that the november SAT was way easier than the June. Math was easy...i missed the cube one because i am incapable of counting the edges of a cube ;) cr i missed a couple (anyone know what the vocab word was for the exaggerated gloom of the artist), and on writing my essay was generic and i missed a couple...hoping for bettter than a 2210 (thats what i got last time) ahhh</p>
<p>idk why everybody is so worried about -1 being an 800 on CR b/c cr usually has the most generous curve out of any section. The first 3 will probably be 800 or MAYBE the first 2 at least no dobut</p>
<p>The gloom SC answer was lugubrious. [Was that experimental?]
And yes, -2 = 800 for CR is pretty normal. However, -3 = 800 is REALLY unusual and probably won't be happening... unfortunately.
I'm also hoping for 2200+! </p>
<p>Oh, and November was EASIER? How can it get ANY easier than June? Wow...</p>
<p>Does anyone else notice that lugubrious was a SC answer on the first official new SAT booklet (and innocuous was an answer to a reading comp question)? I knew the word right away because of that. If they're already recycling words after 2 years then I'm just going to study all the vocab from official practice tests!</p>
<p>I took the March SAT. When comparing the two, I thought June was harder in all aspects, though not by a lot. Well except CR, I thought that was a lot harder than usual. But then again, I did a lot of prepping for March, and from March to June I did nothing.</p>
<p>For the trapezoid one, I just found the exterior angle of one connection of trapezoids to be 20.</p>
<p>360/20 = 18.</p>
<p>lehighnesh that is waaay to subjective. I thought the december math SAT was much easier than this one, but the curve was 1 wrong for an 800...it really depends on the person and since it is so subjective no one knows for sure until scores come out.</p>
<p>I'm thinking--</p>
<p>M: -1 = 780
CR: -2 = 800
W: Same old curve. </p>
<p>Probably won't deviate much.</p>
<p>I'm pretty sure the curve is pre-determined (that's why we have that extra 10th section, it determines NEXT time's curve)...</p>
<p>yah the curve is pre-determined, but the chance that -1 is an 800 for math is still there since the december 2006 proved it for me.</p>
<p>Oh well, I only took the SAT in hopes of getting the presidential scholar...so I don't get to meet bush...tough luck XD</p>
<p>I borrowed my friends' Q&S for the October and January tests.</p>
<p>October 2006
Math
54-800
53-800</p>
<p>I don't think the October math was difficult at all (nothing like the trapezoid), so this was a great curve. (I got -0 on it, anyway)</p>
<p>January 2007
Math
54-800
53-780
52-760
51-740
50-720</p>
<p>CR
67-800
66-800
65-800
64-800
63-780</p>
<p>But if you get 3 wrong in CR (no skipping), then that actually turns into a -4, whereas 2 wrong stays -2. Oh, and 'lugubrious' was in the January test as well as one of the online course tests.</p>
<p>I think it will be</p>
<p>Math
54-800
53-800
52-780
51-760
50-740</p>
<p>CR
67-800
66-800
65-800
64-780
63-760</p>
<p>I would be AMAZED if -1 = 800 for Math.</p>
<p>Why? It's happened before..</p>