<p>"checking th box", "crossing all the t's", it is a figure of speech...</p>
<p>As for attacking me because I go to a prep school, and have my hand held...well. Even at good schools, you sometimes do not get the right information.</p>
<p>My parents were thousands of miles away and I still talked to them about having the scores sent or not.</p>
<p>If you looked at my post, I did not specify I and/or II when refering to the SAT. So, even if it has been a couple of years, I'm aware that the SAT I is DIFFERENT than the SAT II. If you send subject tests, they'll see the SAT scores, just like when you take the SAT I.</p>
<p>I notice that instead of discussing the ambiguity about the Collegeboard and WHO is ultimately resonsible, some have chosen to tell me I should "be quiet" since I attended a prep school, and because I did not specify about whether I was speaking of the SAT I or II, never mind no one asked for clarification, and for my use of a common term.</p>
<p>Color me surprized. If you don't agree with what I say, you could refrain from attacking my school or tell me "your remarks become less credible because on the one hand you are saying the student should KNOW not to fill out the name of their high school on the CollegeBoard forms, yet you don't even seem to be aware that there is NO score choice with SAT scores and all scores are sent, not just best scores or chosen scores or most recent sitting etc. So, even you are not entirely informed about all the ins and outs of standardized test score reporting." </p>
<p>It can be an effective debate tactic, but is not always a good way to promote an open discussion...now is it?</p>
<p>Again, where exactly did I specify that I was speaking of the SAT I & II? And even Chedva conceeds that the SATs used to have score choice a while back (several years, I believe). How is that uninformed? Perhaps, the tactic is to attack the one who has an unpopular opinion...woww.</p>
<p>As for scores on a HS transcript, it's part of the academic record, as scores can be part of them depending on the individual schools policies. It's the parents and students responsibility to be aware of their schools policy on the issue. If it's not the kids fault, not the parents fault, then it's ALL the schools fault...never mind that public school systems lack money, as it was pointed out in another post.</p>
<p>Why not spread some of the blame to the one who filled out the registration, or the one who is responsible for the kid until they are 18, or spread some to the Collegeboard, or to the colleges that use the scores from a HS transcript, rather than blame an already embattled HS school system? As Someone who dressed me down about being ignorant about when the change happend, why don't you dress down those who do not check the forms their kids sign, or discuss colleges practice of identifying HS school transcripts as "official", even as it helps those who are less affluent apply to more than a few schools--since there are limited waivers???</p>
<p>Perhaps it's because being RESPONSIBLE for a teenagers actions does not extend to BEFORE the commitment of the act. Rather than look at the forms before it's sent in, make a big stink after the scores are recieved?</p>
<p>Shouldn't parents (and kids) find out what HS policies affect them BEFORE they register? </p>
<p>National test, including the Stanford achievement tests, and others, are part of the academic record.</p>
<p>Even if scores belong to the students, if they have it as part of their academic record, then it is the HS responsibility as well to report it, seeing as applicants tweak their ECs, etc...to LOOK better to adcoms. It's competitive, so why not recognize that fact, instead of turning it into another "sombody done sombody wrong song...?"</p>
<p>I'd agree that it's a legal argument unambiguiously, if these discussions would take place before scores have been reported. Usually, the topic rears its ugly head AFTER people know thier scores and do not want it to be part of the picture they draw for the adcoms. No moral ambiguity there. Right.</p>