Let's try to make the March 2010 CR Curve

<p>67 800
66 800
65 780
64 750
63 740
62 720
61 710
60 700
59 or less = > 700</p>

<p>The January test was so much easier and even it had a better curve according to the Jan 2010 QAS. This sucks so much.</p>

<p>Amen to that last sentence. I can testify that 63 - 740 is correct. <em>cries</em></p>

<p>Could someone confirm if 60 was a 700?</p>

<p>I can testify for the 61 = 710 :(</p>

<p>Alright we need 60, 64, and 62 confirmed.</p>

<p>hmm…my friend got a 730</p>

<p>^Could you ask him what his raw score was?</p>

<p>60 was a 710 </p>

<p>I got 6 wrong and then another point off for the guessing penalty.</p>

<p>52 was a 640.</p>

<p>Revised</p>

<p>67 800
66 800
65 780
64 750
63 740
62 730
61 720
60 710
59 700</p>

<p>Looks like this was the curve. Still need to conform 59 though.</p>

<p>Wow that is a brutal curve…</p>

<p>I got -3 (0 omit), for a raw of 63.25. Which is 740.</p>

<p>wow. everyone who got -3 got robbed.</p>

<p>^Yeah, I felt bad about getting 780 for -2, until I saw the -3 questions -> 740. That’s just really sick.</p>

<p>You guys have just gotten too good. The College Board doesn’t know what to do when almost half the test-takers can read at a high school level.</p>

<p>the score range is 710 to 770 for someone who got three wrong with a 740… but one less careless mistake and you’re at 780. funny how things work out.</p>

<p>^I’m sorry. A 40 point drop for one more CR question is unfair.</p>

<p>And lol @ silverturtle. Yeah, I think SAT curves are getting pretty ridiculous. -2 math = 740? I hope colleges don’t weigh the SAT as heavily as most CC people believe.</p>

<p>Could someone conform 59? We still need to know what was the minimum raw score on the March test for a 700.</p>

<p>the curve was ridiculously harsh… i got 2 wrong and that was a 740</p>

<p>^ You got three wrong.</p>