<p>Krazie, </p>
<p>I don’t care what anyone says, this is THE most intense rivalry in the nation. And Im not just referring to the football game. These school’s have been battling for the lion’s share of state and federal funding from day one. Since UA was created first, and bears the state’s name, it is considered the Flagship university of Alabama. But Auburn was chosen over UA to become the state’s land grant university in the late 1800s. That designation allowed AU to slowly grow till it surpassed UA in enrollment in the late 1940s, despite years of receiving less funding from the state than UA. </p>
<p>When AU became the largest university in the state (UA became the largest school in the state, once again in 2006), it was able to develop greater political support, and it began to thrive. Because AU has more students studying engineering and the sciences, it gets more state funding from Alabama. Yet the poor state funding in the past has continued to haunt AU and alumni to this day, and they insist that UA receives preferential treatment in everything. </p>
<p>The stereotype is that UA has the prettier campus (by far), is the school for business, law, medicine, the arts, and is the destination for the children of the state’s upper class, while AU is the school for Vet Med, Engineering, Agriculture, Forestry, and the Sciences, and is the destination for the state’s middle class. While AU’s campus is not as pretty as Bama’s it has come a long way, and I think it is lovely campus now. Similarly, while AU has traditionally had a greater emphasis on the Sciences, UA is rapidly closing that gap, and while UA has traditionally had a greater emphasis on Business, AU’s School of Business is not far behind UA’s in the rankings. And as for which class goes where, I think it is nonsense. There are just as many upper crust folks who end up at AU than UA. In fact, UA is more diverse given its signficantly higher enrollment of Black students. Yet AU, with its proximity to Atlanta, has signficantly higher numbers of out of state students, though UA is catching up there too. </p>
<p>So the stereotypes are only half true, but they persist, and both alumni look down their noses at the other. I don’t think most UA people realize what a fine school AU is, how nice much of its campus is, and I dont think that most AU people realize the juggernaut that UA is becoming. Many of them still think AU is the more prestigious school, though the last decade’s rankings have usually had UA ahead of AU. And they insist AU is “harder to get into” than UA, pointing to AU’s modestly higher ACT/SAT range, though UA has a much higher application rejection rate. </p>
<p>When I attended UA in the late 80s, AU was the higher ranked program. What happened at AU in the 80s mirrors what is happening at UA right now. Back then, they were getting the modern facilities, though they were not nearly as beautiful as the new buildings going up at UA. See, I’m caught up in the rivalry too!</p>
<p>But what really ticks Auburn fans off the most is the nine straight years in the seventies that UA beat AU in football. Those were tragic days for AU, and many kids in Alabama who pulled for Auburn experienced the merciless boasts of UA children all year. AU won the Iron Bowl six out of ten years in the 80s, thus restoring some pride to their fans. Then Bama won 7 out of the 10 Iron Bowls in the nineties. Then AU won seven of the 10 Iron Bowls in the last decade, including an unprecedented six in a row, which almost killed many UA faithful. With Saban in charge, and the expansion of BDS, the AU fans are once again, feeling like the red headed step child of the state. lol</p>