<p>Lol im at -2 now. Lol i think thatll be a 730. Lol</p>
<p>-2 will probably be around a 750 or 760</p>
<p>@allan74</p>
<p>Thanks, lol. I just really wanted that 800 in math… It’s the only thing I’m ever positive I can get an 800 in and now I’ve made the dumbest mistakes ever. 
I know about superscores, but would it look bad if I took the test for a 3rd time, perhaps? If I were take it again it would be in either June or October. </p>
<p>Anyway, I can’t remember if I put 3600 or 6400 for the shaded squares one. Was 3600 even an option? Because if so, I forgot to subtract and I’m screwed…</p>
<p>Oh, and also, for the triangle with area between 5 and 9, did anyone put a=3 or a=4?</p>
<p>3600 wasn’t an option I believed.</p>
<p>Are you sure? I could have sworn I saw it under (A). I really hope it wasn’t.</p>
<p>3600 was option A</p>
<p>stupid question…which graph was inversely proportional? it had like graphs of x=2, y=2, a sort of parabola, a line, and a curve…</p>
<p>novelida, it was the curve.</p>
<p>does anybody remember some of the questions on the very last 16 minute section, I rushed that and finished super quickly. Idk how I did.</p>
<p>■■■. so how much do you think -3 would be exactly? ~740 I’m hoping?</p>
<p>@AnonymousA
I wouldnt take it a 3rd time</p>
<p>Jebus Mcneebus. It asked for the SHADED region. </p>
<p>Shaded = 6400 :D</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Just hope for lenient scaling.</p>
<p>Can someone please give me a few of the questions that were in the experimental section? Did anyone have a question where it gave you a chart, then it said something like (not 100% accurate but…) f(r) = c f(c) = r, or something like that. I omitted it, and that was definitely my worst section. </p>
<p>I think at this point I have 1 wrong in the fill-in section (so nothing is deducted), 1 omitted, and i’d guess I maybe made 1-2 more stupid mistake. anyone know what that would be? That would make my raw score 51.5/54, what is that?</p>
<p>I am so angry that I got that one with the (2^2x+1)(3^4)(5^x)… problem wrong. I had 5 mins to solve it, I got each variable, x = 12, y = 4, z = 30, then I got 5160 after typing it in to my calculator. I investigated after I came home and it turns out I typed in 12 times 430 instead of 12 times 4 times 30…grrrr…</p>
<p>the f(r) = c f(c) = r was in my math section and i had experimental reading, so that wasn’t experimental.</p>
<p>that f(r)=c f(c)=r was 0 right ?</p>
<p>darn, if thats the case I have that omitted, one more that I know of wrong and likely 2 or 3 tops more wrong. </p>
<p>CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME:
What would you expect 51.75/54 raw score to be?
How about 50/54?</p>
<p>I left it omitted because I skipped it and tried to go back but ran out of time. As it turns out there was another one on the test in my experimental and I finally understood it then.</p>
<p>@howmanyofme yeah, it was 0</p>
<p>That rounds in your favor to 52/54… gives you 740-780 depending on difficulty, 760 as average.
50/54: 710-740.</p>
<p>Thanks Lanaryru - just one more number to run by you. suppose I got 4 wrong and one omitted, though that would be a max. That would be a 47.75 which rounds to 48. What would you estimate a 48 to be?</p>
<p>@howmanyofme, yes I got 0 for f(r)=c f(c)=r</p>