<p>@Hawkace</p>
<p>I can’t remember the question :/</p>
<p>and the one about air pollutants— “filtering pollutants out of the air” (best I could remember) couldn’t this possibly be incorrect idiom i.e. from. These two, were the only two I had to gauge on the writing.</p>
<p>I said differing was the error. Different sounded better to me but I don’t know</p>
<p>@phendaphen</p>
<p>Hawkace, the preposition is fine but “differing” just seems awk. may be me, would just like some clarification for future test(s)</p>
<p>What’s the condensus on rudimentary hypothesis or informed speculation? </p>
<p>*concensus</p>
<p>I honestly don’t know about that, @phendaphen</p>
<p>Holy crap, I spent like 10 minutes on that question about “filtering out of the air”. The idiom is correct though. Think about it. </p>
<p>@Mathandmusic914 I am certain that it is an informed speculation</p>
<p>@Hawkace</p>
<p>YES!!! :)</p>
<p>i found the math incredibly easy, the writing easy, and the reading as very difficult. what is the expected curve, that reading seemed very difficult, i missed a good few on it.</p>
<p>For the language question it should be A since it was comparing the languages by themselves</p>
<p>@koalakolla Like I said 10 times before, they were comparing the Greek roots not the languages themselves.Remember? </p>
<p>@Hawkace is right, people keep asking the same question</p>
<p>It was a trick question. It made it look like it was comparing the roots but it actually wasn’t. If you read very closely it was actually only comparing the two languages. </p>
<p>Ok, so this fricking acupuncture question on what passage 2 is trying to say, i put that the data is fraudulent because the whole entire thing is saying how we should doubt it because all the info is bias. People are telling me that it’s evaluate objectively, but he never encouraged that; he only said it was very biased and to doubt it. Also, for the last question on the prince story, i put something about a “____ conclusion.” anyone else?</p>
<p>hypothesis vs speculation was difficult. The CR section consisted of many questions that could be narrowed down to two potential answers but one happened to be “more right”. Personally, I chose “rudimentary hypothesis” because he was using “If” at the beginning of each sentence within the included lines.</p>
<p>he is author</p>
<p>wait, i’m confused, somebody: passage 2 fraudelent?</p>
<p>@koalakolla Are you kidding me? Then, it was a trick, trick question then. I reviewed three times. It went something like this. "The Greek roots of the language, Spanish (or something) are similar (to those of Catalan). </p>
<p>@underbiz101 It was evaluate objectively. Think about it. He doesn’t outright calls it false. </p>
<p>@phendaphen Remember when he says that the gap coincides with the purchase of the land? Based on this info, and his hypothesis, he made an informed speculation. </p>