<p>no hawkace, you were right about the greek roots</p>
<p>also, the last question on the prince story…i put “_____ conclusion;” i forgot the word before it</p>
<p>Someone should make a list. I don’t want to keep repeating myself. </p>
<p>i mean, i don’t want to look through 20 tabs</p>
<p>he repeatedly used If, therfore signifying hypotheticalness </p>
<p>I read it differently. The language which had Greek roots was similar to Catalan, blah blah blah</p>
<p>@koalakolla Ah. that’s probably it. Most of the people here can testify that it was greek roots that were being compared. </p>
<p>@phendaphen “hypotheticalness” Is that an actual word? Lol. He may have said ifs multiple times but he deliberately says that the purchase coincides with the gap. </p>
<p>What was the question/other answers for the acupunture data fraudulent, evaluate objectively question?</p>
<p>was the math experimental in section 7?? with the really hard MC and free response questions? i was kind of confused because i had two math sections with free response. please help! </p>
<p>@unproductive the other answers were definitely wrong. Most people got down to those two answers. I picked evaluate objectively. </p>
<p>Im very confident it is Evaluate objectivity because he discusses how most of the acupuncture studies were probably done on people who believed in acupuncture </p>
<p>i put objectively question, none of the rest of his argument was inflammatory, therefore, i thought kit wouldn’t be right to outright discredit the data</p>
<p>Ahh now I remember the question. Yeah, I put evaluate objectively</p>
<p>It’s definitely the answer with objectively as the author said that many of the results were biased because people only partake in the studies if they already like acupuncture or something like that.</p>
<p>And just to back up hawkace, it was definitely comparing the Greek roots to those of Catalan.</p>
<p>Also, did anyone get Jefferson’s inaugural speech as a piece. I’m thinking it was experimental as the questions were very different to anything I had seen before. It was a breeze however as I already knew the speech from history class.</p>
<p>That one was experimental…</p>
<p>Thanks @Christobal21. So, we just have to wait and see. </p>
<p>just off topic folks, but do you think this schedule is good for junior year?</p>
<p>AP english 11
AP calculus AB
AP Us History
AP chemistry
Honors Physics
Organic chem
spanish 3</p>
<p>And just to introduce myself, I’m kyle, I’m 16, science and math are my strong suits, and not that it really matters, but my IQ is 146. 190 for november PSAT, 73m, 57cr, 60w</p>
<p>What about the Mayflower/Plymouth ACT section </p>