<p>@ThemasterOG I concur with @Rookie97 because “disproportionately” was describing “large”, which is an adjective. You use adverbs to describe adjectives.</p>
<p>Hey guys, what did you get for the question about thingness? Did you get inanimate quality?</p>
<p>From thoroughly examining the google docs and this thread countless times I have reached a conclusion in regarding to the controversial writing questions.</p>
<p>1) “Though differing in tone, both…” There is support for circling “though differing” and no error.
2) Filtering out of the air" Once again support for both no error and “out of”. The sentence may have been grammatically correct (idk) but it was for sure awkward.
3) IMP. SENT. “Montenegro and its independence” There is great support for A but the first and second clause were in the same tense as written even though the second clause referred to the “twentieth century”. ANS. was either B or C.
4) Payphone was “had” to establish the fact that the revolutionizing occurred before the contemporary increase in mobile devices.
5) IT WAS NOT COMPARING LANGUAGES IT WAS COMPARING ROOTS ANS. “those of Catlan”</p>
<p>You guys are right! ■■■■ me I should have put no error and yea I got 47 also I think it was like 12+35=47</p>
<p>Damn the bijah passage was so tough! Hopefully they have a good English curve this time</p>
<p>Whatever @phendaphen said is right. It’s too late now. Let’s just wait for 18 more days for our scores. There’s no point in getting worried for nothing. </p>
<p>What was the answer to the one that said 4<square root of m< 5
4<cubed root of p< 5
I 3125 because I rounded up</p>
<p>@ParasPatel
24 x 124 = 2976</p>
<p>@ThemasterOG right about what?</p>
<p>This post from a while back should explain my thoughts on why it is not “had revolutionized”:</p>
<p>October 2009
From misterkevinsun,</p>
<p>(When Marie Curie shared) the 1903 Nobel Prize for Physics (with two other) scientists-her husband Pierre Curie and Henri Becquerel-she (had been) the first woman (to win) the prize. No error.</p>
<p><strong><em>The sharing of the prize took place at the exact same time as did her being the first woman to receive the prize. Accordingly, *</em></strong>they should be in the same tense. “had been” should be “was.”</p>
<p>AHHHHHH I really hope “though differing” and “out of” end up being grammatically incorrect. Then I’d only have 1 wrong and maintain that 800!!! I am hoping for a 12 on the essay; received 11 last time.</p>
<p>@foolish I see your perspective but that sentence is in the past tense from the get-go; therefore, the second clause would need to match. For the pay phones question it spoke in the present perfect “have become” then went had to go into "they had revolutionized to fulfill parallelism</p>
<p>@UseTheForceHarry Did the question say that m and p were whole numbers?</p>
<p>@indianboy2400
Plastics are also inanimate objects. It was fixed nature, I think.</p>
<p>@Wumboo
I think it said that they were integers, but it was pretty obvious that they were both positive.</p>
<p>Also:</p>
<p>The pluperfect is a type of verb form, traditionally treated as one of the tenses of certain languages, used in referring to something that occurred earlier than the time being considered, <strong><em>when the time being considered is already in the past.</em></strong>****</p>
<p>Present perfect is not already past.</p>
<p>@foolish There’s a difference between that sentence and the sentence on the SAT. the two answers that were left were “had revolutionized” and “revolutionized”. "revolutionized is past tense and “had revolutionized” is past perfect. What you are talking is about is past progressive which is different. Honestly, let’s just wait and see what the answer is. </p>
<p>@UsetheForceHarry both r and p were negative. </p>
<p>@Hawkace
Different problem.
I think Wumboo was asking about 4<squrt(m)<5; 4<cbrt(p)<5</p>
<p>As for the r and p problem, I agree that both were negative (p<r<0).</p>
<p>@UseTheForceHarry I guess i might have just misread it, but I figured since it didn’t specify you could put 24.9 as opposed to 24 to make it bigger, and with that logic it’s impossible to find the largest number.
Bad judgement on my part i guess</p>