<p>Nope^ we didnt memorize question and the answer choices lol</p>
<p>I deleted JFK. It was irrelevant. Montenegro was not A!!! The two clauses of the sentence had to be in different tenses. current state of Montenegro in beg. then referred to Montenegro’s political state 20th Century in second half</p>
<p>@ThemasterOG : their is ambigious. That question should be thrown out. Their could refer to goats or the officials. </p>
<p>with A they were in same tense</p>
<p>What was the Montenegro question? </p>
<p>I may be getting letters mixed up; I just know that the answer was in two different tenses appropriately.</p>
<p>The “had” was actually incorrect. The full second part was:</p>
<p>Pay phones had revolutionized communications when they were implemented. It’s not logical to say they already had revolutionized something before they were implemented, so you can’t use had. </p>
<p>The correct answer is pay phones revolutionized communication when they were implemented. </p>
<p>@Hawkace but :their was the best answer with choices given. Montenegro something something about its recent independence, something something in the twentieth century.</p>
<p>it’s had</p>
<p>Phendaphen, think of it like this:</p>
<p>Would it be logical to say “he had won when he played the game” or “he won when he played”</p>
<p>@MovingtoTexas It needs consistency so “had” is right. </p>
<p>Let me explain once again. </p>
<p>Past perfect is used when an action is done before another action. Pay phones have been becoming obsolete, but when they were released, they had revolutionized communications. Before becoming obsolete, they had done something. See it now? It’s “had”. </p>
<p>The argument of parallelism is incorrect for that as well, it is hardly a list, and correct verbiage trumps subjective parallelism preferences. </p>
<p>@foolish I just explained it in the post before. Look at it. </p>
<p>For the Montenegro question didn’t the answer have being in it?</p>
<p>Yeah. It wasn’t A because it had “being” in it. </p>
<p>Nobody else got the “learning set experiment” questions? It was the oddest SAT set I’ve ever seen. The last couple questions were about a graph, and I was like “huh, there’s math in reading?! Huh! Easy points! XD” </p>
<p>AND I got 4 darn reading sections! I’m a powerhouse in math, but my luck, I got FOUR reading sections! Did really well on the first three vocab, thought i was done, then go hit with the back-to-back reading sections that destroyed me. Did not know what celerity, ribald, diffidence, or anything meant. Got 4 questions wrong on a 16 question set -_-. So mad haha.</p>
<p>But really. Did anybody get the “learning set experient” article? With the chimpanzee and rats and squirrels? I don’t see anybody else posting about it .</p>
<p>*if somebody replies to this, will it pop up in my notifications? If not, I’ll just refresh this page a bunch of times haha</p>
<p>Hey what was the main idea for the Elijah passage? I put like chain of explanation. Does anyone remember this…</p>
<p>@Hawkace</p>
<p>Past perfect is when a PAST action occurs before another PAST action. The sentence used present perfect, which is not a past action. It is comparing a present ongoing action and action prior to it, which reverts to past tense, not past perfect.</p>
<p>Yep I did get the learning set section with the graph</p>
<p>@eding97 it was experimental for the learning set whatever you had.</p>