<p>Yo guys, the broccoli one was to demonstrate a point for fresh foods, because the broccoli example had a word “maligned” in it</p>
<p>@breaker746 I think I’m talking about a different question. Ugh I’m so confused now.</p>
<p>@Xanonymous2010:
For the one with the answer was superficial/cursory, I think it was something about why the scientists couldn’t use a piece of work.</p>
<p>I didn’t think it was only talking about the 2D footprints on the captivated-unexcited question, though.</p>
<p>“unexcited”</p>
<p>was this referring to the 2D footprint?</p>
<p>I meant #8 on one of the vocab sections. It was about a reviewer’s commentary sometimes being blatantly ____ and sometimes being _____.</p>
<p>Anyone know the context of resplendent? What about that fabric one (velvety?)</p>
<p>Question.
for “Europeans had assumptions of what gardens were supposed to look like” why wouldn’t it be that they didn’t notice the natural boundaries or whatever? Because wasn’t the end of the passage that they took food without realizing it was from some woman’s garden?
I didn’t think it implied anything about what gardens were supposed to look like 
I think I misunderstood the question - does anyone remember what the question was asking?</p>
<p>I believe. It said something about “old hat” as well. Old hat implies unexcitedness (is this a word? lol).</p>
<p>@luca</p>
<p>It said something that the sailors were accustomed to European gardens. So they thought that this jungle was special. The author argues that the people of africa view it as pretty normal.</p>
<p>Communist, Resplendent was in the same question with Velvety, where the answer was resplendent. It was regarding the bright jewellike toned silks from Medieval Lucca Italy. I put diaphonous… -.-</p>
<p>@ boston</p>
<p>Yes, the old hat meant that the was unexcited. The guy said that footprints could tell lots of things, but then says that was old news and moved on to discuss the new 3-D footprints.</p>
<p>Consolidated List</p>
<p>Vocabulary - NO EXPERIMENTAL ANSWERS
Chagrin
Unfailing
Fascinated/Prospects
Disingenuous
Trendsetter
■■■■■■/Rancidness
Characterless
Caustic/Obstreperous
Resplendent
Adept/Pantheon
Stigmatized/Vindicated
Superficial/Cursory
Autobiographical
Feigned/Hypocrisy
Proficient/Repertory
Salutary/Unconventional
Conversant</p>
<p>Passages - NO EXPERIMENTAL ANSWERS</p>
<p>Effects of TV on Courts Double Passage
Both authors granted concessions
Both authors drew comparisons
Both authors agree media coverage of courts could be educational
Ill-advised is what Judge thinks the plan proposed by Passage 1
Stage means phase
Common - cameras will eventually become
Two passages disagree on the proportion of issues that are important in televised court</p>
<p>Story of Africa Passage
Boundaries were part of the natural setting
Landed means arrived
Marked means delineate
Europeans had assumptions of what gardens were supposed to look like
Wonder is tone of sailors
“Story began 500 years ago” amends a previous assertion
Author did not appeal to an authority
Legends fill in for blank areas in map</p>
<p>Storytelling Passage (Short)
Used skills in writing learned as a child
Cadences to imitate natural storytelling i.e. rising, falling</p>
<p>TV Dinners Passage (Short)</p>
<p>Main Idea- to dispel a common misconception
reference to broccoli- provide an example/nature of fresh foods (need more debate on this)</p>
<p>Painter passage
Admiration is tone of author
Unpretentious manner is the style of the painter
Artistic weaknesses are shown by the bad copies of B Franklin
Desire to share knowledge
Decorative style of England contrasted painters style</p>
<p>Dinosaur passage
Unexcited - the authors attitude toward “secrets”
Movement in the ground is similar to movement in the air - Reason for excitement of new discovery
The new discoveries contradicted the computer models
movement of the bird’s feet in the air.
human footprint in wet vs dry soil- provides an example people can relate to to illustrate the point
Dinosaur’s lower their feet first
Scientist’s method: experimentation and extrapolation
Research overshadowed previous interest in mammals
The dry footprints were valuable but not noteworthy
Author explains definition of trace fossil to prevent misunderstanding</p>
<p>Adapting Films Passage:
First author was conflicted, second was assertive
Author 1 would disagree because people want to see accurate adaptations
Passage 1 defends a qualified position, Passage 2 rejects it</p>
<p>What was that one about the innate children math skills clock thing?</p>
<p>Wait a sec… I don’t remember autobiographical as an answer to a SC question… wasn’t it an answer to the passage about the painter?</p>
<p>^unfailing</p>
<p>^
Autobiographical was a SC question. </p>
<p>^^
Innate children had the unfailing clock.</p>
<p>@ the Adapting Films Passage:</p>
<p>What was the first question, about what the authors would agree on?
Was it that they would say “not to simply judge films based on fidelity”?</p>
<p>Can you remind me of what the question was (for the autobiographical one)?</p>
<p>yeah, I said not to simply judge films based on fidelity.</p>
<p>@communist - thanks for the clarification</p>
<p>@ alihaq</p>
<p>It was the author encorporated many of her own childhood experiences into her novels.</p>