March SAT Writing Thread

<p>I know this VERY vague, but did #28 have an idiom error (I think C?) I don’t remember the exact word so it’s not much help but it was ___ on, and I think it should’ve been ___ in? Can anyone confirm?</p>

<p>I dont remember the one about involved and evolved…was that experimental?</p>

<p>@crzygmer</p>

<p>Yep. The ___ is “succeeded”. And it’s in instead of on.</p>

<p>^ experimental</p>

<p>I had a good number of NE’s on the ID’s</p>

<p>what would a raw score of 46-48 be with a 10 essay</p>

<p>I ****ed up CR though real bad. lol So gonna retake in may and probably june also sigh high school life :)</p>

<p>how about the one with “for which?” i put it as an error cuz it should be “by which”</p>

<p>Were involve/evolve, ID coins, and return back experimental? I don’t remember seeing them.</p>

<p>Was “return back” an error?</p>

<p>return back was not experimental
it was an error</p>

<p>Involve/evolve seems to be experimental and so does ID coins</p>

<p>“but it was ___ on, and I think it should’ve been ___ in? Can anyone confirm?”
the word was “succeeded” and that was an idiom error.</p>

<p>Return back was an error, yes.</p>

<p>It is very hard to remember writing questions. We’re better off just waiting for our scores or contemplating answers on the for the other two sections.</p>

<p>nvm, yeah idiom was #28</p>

<p>What was the experimental section?</p>

<p>I believe it was “had success on making their…” or something to that effect. I should have been “had success in making their.”</p>

<p>Just a general discussion but what did you guys write your essays on? I used 1984, Mussolini, and Macbeth. Hopefully 10+</p>

<p>@ NYEM - That is what I said as well.</p>

<p>Hitler and a fake “personal” anecdote.</p>

<p>@ CrzyGmer789X2: I used Hitler, FDR, and Andrew Jackson. Out of curiosity, how did you use 1984 for that one? Did you say that Winston and Julia broke the law and benefitted themselves or something?</p>

<p>I used Hitler and some of the US Presidents. And I mentioned that the argument against used a logical fallacy - argumentum ad populum.</p>

<p>Was the correct answer for the director “If he would have been given” or “were he to be given”</p>

<p>I put were he to be given.</p>