<p>For the schools listed in the OP (Michigan, UCLA, NYU), admission to the MT program is based on:</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Meeting the minimum academic requirements to be considered for an audition.</p></li>
<li><p>Meeting the artistic audition requirement.</p></li>
<li><p>Being selected from the pool of qualified applicants from 1 and 2 based on a largely subjective review of the audition results and whatever other considerations are weighted into the mix.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>You don’t need AP Calc to meet the minimum academic standards to be considered admission to the MT programs at any of these schools.</p>
<p>You better be really, really good in your artistic audition.</p>
<p>There is a POSSIBILITY that AP Calc vs. AP Stats would make a difference for final consideration, but the PROBABILITY that it will be an important factor is likely to be low, probably very low, for the schools listed, and, frankly, for the rest of the most popular 40-50 audition-based MT programs (Northwestern is not an audition-based program for admission, you audition after you get in). Taking the postulated choice in the OP of AP Stats as an alternative to AP Calc with likely a higher grade would probably lower any advantage to be gained from slugging your way through AP Calc to almost nil, especially if that would result in a lower grade, for the 40-50 most popular audition-based MT programs.</p>
<p>I doubt very seriously that many students were good enough artistically to get into the MT programs at NYU, Michigan, or UCLA, but lost out on admission because they took AP Stats instead of AP Calc. AP Stats would seem to be a better life skills choice for someone pursuing a career in the arts - you don’t use calculus to generate a P&L, but it really helps to be able to understand statistically based extrapolation, trend analysis, and data mining to stay afloat in the theatre business.</p>