<p>I have heard that Barron's is really good but also that it has a TON of errors and sucks.</p>
<p>I heard that PR is solid but the test was harder than PR.</p>
<p>I heard that Kaplan is good but the test was harder.</p>
<p>What's the truth?</p>
<p>i used PR, good explanations, i got 750s on the PR tests but 800 on the real thing, i also wrote out flash cards for basically all the math concepts in the book</p>
<p>i didn't really hardcore study
i read through Barron's in 45 minutes and did 2 practice tests and 2 CB tests
got an 800 on the real thing
Barron's is harder but i thought that it most accurately depicted the real test..
i thought the practice CB test were a lot easier
definitely practice especially if you're not fast (for me...it's all about speed)
and apparently getting a hold of a Ti-89 is helpful although i got an 800 with a Ti-84</p>
<p>When I first started prepping with Barrons, I had forgotten everything I learned in precalc. Afterwards, I felt very comftorable with the concepts and ended up getting an 800 in Math II! Though it does have quite a few errors, the review is very helpful, and after taking a few of the Barrons' practice tests, the actual thing is cakewalk.</p>