<p>@brandnew the question was:
what would guthrie think of the paintings mentioned in lines 13-17 of p1 (the referred lines was waxing poetic about the bison hunters and lions and whatnot and they were pictures “frequently reproduced in textbooks”)</p>
<p>Okay I remember that question now…what were the answer choices like?</p>
<p>1)early attempts by accomplished artists
2)data for art historians
3)evidence for natural history or something like that
dont remember the last two…</p>
<p>@Brandnew3773</p>
<p>Hmm… Could you please tell me exactly how the “futility” answer choice was worded because I don’t even recall seeing an answer choice with “futility” in it. There was efforts, magic, and some other choices that I remember eliminating.</p>
<p>well I know I didn’t go with the early attempts by ACCOMPLISHED artists because Guthrie stated that he thinks the art was created by teenagers having fun</p>
<p>@saut, one of them was like “to show the difference between ancient and modern art” and another one was like “to show how aesthetics change through the ages” sorry if I’m thinking about a totally different question…</p>
<p>I don’t remember how the answer was worded exactly.</p>
<p>Wasn’t it evidence for natural history? Is this the one that people are saying is aesthetics?</p>
<p>but the thing is, gutrhie said that the teenager paintings were rarely included in textbooks, and the lines13-17 painitngs WERE REPRODUCED in textbooks, and for me, none of the other ones made even a remotely ink of sense and i just went with this train of thinking</p>
<p>and im still very confused about the futility thing… i really hope someone can tell us the exact wording of that choice.</p>
<p>I put evidence for art historians.</p>
<p>@sauternety36</p>
<p>For some reason, I don’t even remember reading an answer choice about futility. Do you?</p>
<p>@saut you got mixed up between passages. Passage one claimed that the paintings were often put in textbooks but Passage 2 claimed the paintings weren’t often put in textbooks. They weren’t saying that the art from the teenagers is what was the determining factor about inclusion in textbooks. So I’m very sure that the answer was not the one about accomplished artists because Guthrie didn’t view the artists as accomplished but rather he thought they were just teenagers who were envying their fathers who were out hunting and so they made drawings of what they thought their fathers were doing while they were cooped up in the caves…</p>
<p>Type in “1” for early accomplished and “2” for evidence for natural history</p>
<p>2</p>
<p>Wait, I don’t think evidence for art historians was a choice, was it? Wasn’t it natural historians?</p>
<p>^^2222222222222</p>
<p>@sweetpuri same here i dont remember futility as an answer but maybe i was so effed over i didnt pay attention to it</p>
<p>and can someone explain the reason behind picking evidence for natural history?</p>
<p>and i really think we should keep discussing the cave paintings answers…
did anyway put gifted paleolithic artists???</p>
<p>Okay, I think I remember now… (My memory is SO bad lmao)</p>
<p>There were two different questions…</p>
<p>The first one was evidence for natural historians because it was asking for Gurthie’s opinion. The other was gifted paleolithic artists, I think.</p>
<p>ok at least i got the gifted thing right </p>
<p>FFFFFFFF for the early attempts </p>
<p>anyone remember any more cave questions???
so far we have:</p>
<ul>
<li>Credibility</li>
<li>Aesthetic power</li>
<li>Beauty is eternal: reverent</li>
<li>Playfully careless</li>
<li>Sympathetic </li>
<li>General agreement </li>
<li>Evocative and moving</li>
<li>emphasize paradox</li>
<li>Gifted artists of the Paleolithic period</li>
<li>Evidence for natural history</li>
</ul>
<p>“Early accomplished artists” shouldnt even be considered as the right answer…Not only was there no information in Guthrie’s article to support the notion that he thought the people who created the art were accomplished, but he actually refuted that claim when he said something along the lines of “despite art historians thinking that the people who created the art on the walls were the Michealangelos of their times, science based on the size of the hands who created the art leads us to believe that it was actually teenagers who created it”…then he goes on to explain the motives for why the teens would have created it. But that is evidence completely against the answer of “Early accomplished artists”</p>