<p>last time i got one wrong and skipped one and got a 760…</p>
<p>for the pyramid does anyone remember which answer choice the square inside the square was?</p>
<p>i gota 740 with 2 blanks wrong and 1 MC wrong…</p>
<p>what would 1 MC get me?</p>
<p>it was C for the pyramid</p>
<p>and what were the naswer choices for the 2 percent of 5 percent of 3x. i remember changing it sinc emy initial answer wasn’t right…</p>
<p>It was a square in a square (I explained it in my previous post)</p>
<p>Hey Guys,
Anyone know if the choice f(0)=-5 was choice D?</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf[/url]”>http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf</a></p>
<p>Hot dog- I think it was C, but that’s what I put (that answer, not sure about the letter.)</p>
<p>IM quite sure it was 0.3% for the percentage one as 0.003 is 0.3%</p>
<p>And I got A^2</p>
<p>i think i may have gotten my 800!!! maybe… consolidated list anyone? </p>
<p>Pyramid…C (square inside square, both in the same orientation).
ab and A+B… y/x
v and A … a^(3/2)</p>
<p>With the one about prime numbers – wasn’t it CONSECUTIVE prime numbers? It appears if not, I got that one wrong… I used 5+7+11 I think</p>
<p>shamoil, was that A? and B was like .03 percent?</p>
<p>@ NspiredOne</p>
<p>Those all seem right! I messed up that one with A and V, I thought they were talking about total surface area :/</p>
<p>NspiredOne, i put the square inside the square but i remember it being E. Im not sure though. </p>
<p>What was the answer to the one with the answers like:
f(0) = -5</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>f(1) = -h</p>
<p>copy and paste the consolidated please:</p>
<p>Consolidated:</p>
<p>1.Pyramid…C (square inside square, both in the same orientation).
2.ab and A+B… y/x
3.v and A … a^(3/2)
4.prime numbers 3,5,11 = 165
5. graph: x+h) k … f(0)=-5</p>
<p>atomic, that was a different question.</p>
<p>As for the 3,7,11 one, I also thought it said consecutive prime numbers. Gosh darn D: I hate when I make mistakes by reading the question wrong.</p>
<p>No chance that it did say consecutive?</p>
<p>@atomica</p>
<p>I thought it was consecutive prime integers too!!! and i found one other person who thought so! im pretty sure its more likely that people didnt see the consecutive part, then 3 people seeing stuff… </p>
<p>so it was like 5<em>7</em>11=385 and 5+7+11=23, a prime integer</p>
<p>i really hope it was consecutive… thatd give me an 800 unless i got an easy one wrong or one not discussed…</p>
<p>which one is atomic talking about? the cube ? cause that is a^3/2</p>