<p>@ aljkhori</p>
<p>that’s what I was trying to refer to also! …but I remember choosing against it after a dead lock on that and something else</p>
<p>The passage stated something along the lines of “the character of the innoncent was shamed”… The key words were character and shamed.</p>
<p>I thought that “want” meant desire… but i totally forgot what the sentence was so i guess im wrong on that.</p>
<p>And i thought that chimps were working together cooperatively cause it was like a factory??</p>
<p>For the last one for the Mexican artist passage, I put an answer along the lines that towards the end of her life, they dresses became more colorful to “hide her growing _______” something like futility or weakness</p>
<p>^ got that too</p>
<p>CR Consolidated List</p>
<h2>36/67</h2>
<p>Sentence Completions</p>
<h2>12/19</h2>
<p>ostensibly(not salient)
squalid(not cataclysmic)
tycoon/philanthropist
succinctly
archeaologist
ferocity/contentious (not accuracy/inexact)
fanciful/exploit(about children’s books being inaccurate)
reticent(timid employees)
nourishment
captivated
commonplace/startling
nominal</p>
<hr>
<p>Passage Based Questions</p>
<h2>24/48</h2>
<p>1) chimpanzees
2) physics string theory</p>
<h2>3) stolen diamond w/ lawyer and butler</h2>
<p>2)author of passage 2 would be in complete agreement
3)butler was deferential at lawyer
prudent (mom going to college with daughter)
typical answer(daughter’s italics remarks)
3)‘want’ means lack of
2)superhuman computer represents lack of technology to use it as a tool
2)passage 2 would say that the mathematicians and physicians should pursue different avenues
3)“as soon as he turned his back” showed his eagerness
3)the quote from robert crusoe represented an omen
3)growing sense of alarm(in lawyer)/moment of perplexity
3)Only repeated meant brevity of interval
1)look in chimpanzee’s eye/raising of hand shows relation between empathy and technology
3)cost means personal toll
1)chimpanzees were cracking nuts
3)puffery was self-regard and exaggeration
lying passage - qualification
welsh passage - her nationality wasn’t her most important characteristic
3)innocent people were defamed
2)passage 1 says reason string theory is hard to prove is because of complexity of mathematics
2)fits and starts was sudden bursts
2)scope and outcome
(frida kahlo) playing a role allows you to express your inner feelings more
2)Authors agree that in its current state the string theory is incomplete</p>
<h2>(frida kahlo) towards the end of her life she started wearing more to hide her growing frailty</h2>
<h2>Passage 3 is here: <a href=“http://collins.thefreelibrary.com/The-Moonstone/1-1[/url]”>http://collins.thefreelibrary.com/The-Moonstone/1-1</a></h2>
<p>Probable curve: <a href=“http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-...est-Curves.pdf[/url]”>http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-...est-Curves.pdf</a></p>
<h2>It will be on the easy side probably in the 3rd or 4th slot.</h2>
<p>keep adding/put a question mark and repost the list with your reason if you disagree</p>
<p>yeah wang, I think it was hide her growing “frailty”</p>
<p>^Hot. Put a question mark next to the chimp/nuts question if you don’t want to refute what I said.</p>
<p>pratt-
Oh yeah, that’s what I put.</p>
<p>everyone, i think were confused about the chimpanzee question. the question with answer choice “cracking nuts” and the other that referred to factories are two different questions.</p>
<p>“everyone, i think were confused about the chimpanzee question. the question with answer choice “cracking nuts” and the other that referred to factories are two different questions.”</p>
<p>Nope. Same question.</p>
<p>Is that an affirmative on frida kahlo and expressing inner feelings? I do remember mulling over that, but I think I ended up going with something else…more superficial. probably not the way to go for an SAT question.</p>
<p>@boston
The explanation was around page 11-15 or so but I’ll put a ? so others can explain
@pratt
I do remember that
@wangh
yup growing frailty is it. added. </p>
<p>CR Consolidated List</p>
<h2>36/67</h2>
<p>Sentence Completions</p>
<h2>12/19</h2>
<p>ostensibly(not salient)
squalid(not cataclysmic)
tycoon/philanthropist
succinctly
archeaologist
ferocity/contentious (not accuracy/inexact)
fanciful/exploit(about children’s books being inaccurate)
reticent(timid employees)
nourishment
captivated
commonplace/startling
nominal</p>
<hr>
<p>Passage Based Questions</p>
<h2>24/48</h2>
<p>1) chimpanzees
2) physics string theory</p>
<h2>3) stolen diamond w/ lawyer and butler</h2>
<p>2)author of passage 2 would be in complete agreement
3)butler was deferential at lawyer
prudent (mom going to college with daughter)
typical answer(daughter’s italics remarks)
3)‘want’ means lack of
2)superhuman computer represents lack of technology to use it as a tool
2)passage 2 would say that the mathematicians and physicians should pursue different avenues
3)“as soon as he turned his back” showed his eagerness
3)the quote from robert crusoe represented an omen
3)growing sense of alarm(in lawyer)/moment of perplexity
3)Only repeated meant brevity of interval
1)look in chimpanzee’s eye/raising of hand shows relation between empathy and technology
3)cost means personal toll
1)chimpanzees were cracking nuts?
3)puffery was self-regard and exaggeration
lying passage - qualification
welsh passage - her nationality wasn’t her most important characteristic
3)innocent people were defamed
2)passage 1 says reason string theory is hard to prove is because of complexity of mathematics
2)fits and starts was sudden bursts
2)scope and outcome
(frida kahlo) playing a role allows you to express your inner feelings more
2)Authors agree that in its current state the string theory is incomplete</p>
<h2>(frida kahlo) towards the end of her life she started wearing more to hide her growing frailty</h2>
<h2>Passage 3 is here: <a href=“http://collins.thefreelibrary.com/The-Moonstone/1-1[/url]”>http://collins.thefreelibrary.com/The-Moonstone/1-1</a></h2>
<p>Probable curve: <a href=“http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-...est-Curves.pdf[/url]”>http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-...est-Curves.pdf</a></p>
<h2>It will be on the easy side probably in the 3rd or 4th slot.</h2>
<p>keep adding/put a question mark and repost the list with your reason if you disagree</p>
<p>@prattennis_1</p>
<p>I’m quite sure on that one.</p>
<p>Wasn’t there also one that said that putting her clothes was a paradox because it hid something and portrayed something else?</p>
<p>no, they were different questions. the former question asked “what is inferred from this line where it says they are using tools” and the answer to that is definitely cracking nuts, because… it is. that was very easy.
the next question asked “what does the narrator mean by factories” and i believe the answer to that question was “they are doing **** in a cooperative manner”</p>
<p>anyone remember a question about someone being “openhanded” about something, I vaguely remember this as one of the final SC questions in a section. it was about a business woman.</p>
<p>@aljohri: yes that one was the one with mask and frame</p>
<p>Anyone else think that the Frida Kahla was the easiest passage ever?</p>
<p>matthew-</p>
<p>I put those two answers too. The first, about cracking nuts, is the first question. The other is towards the middle.</p>
<p>@ aljhori. yep, it was something about a mask and it indicated that she had two different identities/personalities/sides/xxx</p>
<p>so that’s that then.</p>