<p>“But even if it were so, I don’t understand how the correct answer could be eagerness. If he was so eager, why would he have attempted to not do it in the first place, and secondly, why would he still be stuck at the same spot 2 hours later?”</p>
<p>I just don’t see him as being eager. TBH I thought all answers were dogshiet. bad question =/</p>
<p>for that I thought the answer was courteous because it said right before that he was trying to be modest about his abilities to the other gentleman and thus wouldn’t want to write the letter before the gentleman left.
but I guess my logic is completely screwy.</p>
<p>ludacris is, sigh, wrong. </p>
<p>… I just cant spell that word right and am lazy to look it up…</p>
<p>^ yeah I’m pretty sure that’s wrong… = /</p>
<p>^^ Yes, there were a suprising number of questions that were poorly written/confusing…</p>
<p>Matthew-
I think you’re correct. I put “lack of knowledge to use it as a tool” as well.
olleger-
String theory is a tool that the scientists use to, basically, explain the universe and how it works. Past generations and scientists now have not mastered this tool. That’s what Passage 1 is talking about. Passage 2 explains that they were never fully explain string theory and use it as a tool.</p>
<p>lol, the rapper</p>
<p>What was the mask and frame one about the costume lady? Was the astrophsyics and chemsistry economical or interdisciplinary? I originally had economical and then interdisciplanary came up again later and i kinda went back and changed it to interdisciplanary based on the context in which interdisciplanary was used.</p>
<p>And i’m pretty sure Ludicrous was the correct answer. It was the only one that made sense of the choices. Cartoons are ludicrous as the character was made out to be. You guys are seriously overthinking it.</p>
<p>^^^ I’m with you on that one lol. not the math complexity one.</p>
<p>^ they contradicted eachother/yes</p>
<p>eromano333 we are not overthinking it. thats just not what ludicrous means. also, could you explain why you chose ludicrous? the painter wanted his paintings to look ludicrous?</p>
<p>Ludicrous as in outrageous…thats what I was thinking. I see no reason that that is not the correct answer. Makes much more sense than succinct to me, theres nothing “short” about a cartoon. What about the other two questions I asked?</p>
<p>What was the actual question you guys are debating that contained ludicrous?</p>
<p>again, succinct does not mean short. it means brief. cartoons are brief.</p>
<p>Definition of succinct: Brief and clearly expressed</p>
<p>That makes more sense then ludicrous</p>
<p>the mask and frame was contradicting purposes. the other one was interdisciplinary.</p>
<p>Thank god…I think i got both of those.</p>
<p>ludicrous!ludicrous! 
you never know</p>
<p>The key word here is “economy” folks. They were being economical with their illustrations, thus succinct. Ludicrous has no evidence from the sentence to back it up other than speculation.</p>
<p>what was the main purpose of the mask lady artist passage?</p>
<p>and i put succinct for that cartoon q.</p>
<p>Didn’t I just explain why succinctly works better?</p>
<p>this economy is ludicrous. That’s all i remember :)</p>
<p>any updates on the consolidated list? could someone repost it? (I am not able to find it)</p>