<p>
[quote]
they have a ridiculous number of extraordinarily well-qualified, smart people to choose from--it stands to reason that they'd want as many different viewpoints as possible.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>^i very much agree</p>
<p>also, collegehopefull, reading your arguments I am almost propelled to say that you live in a bubble (but i know that that is probably not true). i used to think the way you do but circumstances changed it. </p>
<p>let's say theoretically that university entrance ran exactly as you stated. do you realistically believe that everything would magically fall in place? that the people you would encounter in class everyday for four years would be the same people you would meet outside in the real world for the rest of your life?</p>
<p>be honest with yourself.</p>
<p>i like your train of thought but the problem is that your ideas are too idealistic for this age; this country has not reached there yet. yes, we've made large leaps in closing the gaps between the 'haves' and 'have-nots' but that schism is still too broad and deep to jump across. small steps are the way to go, especially if we're dealing with a very sensitive but major issue.</p>
<p>tread softly...</p>
<p>
[quote]
The point I have tried to make, many times, is that the criteria for admission into a school should be purely academic.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>that would make the admissions process purely numeric. only the top of the top (in money, mostly) would make it and they are usually those kids with the best test prep tutors, money to afford admissions coaches, etc....personality, hardships, etc would not be taken into account. in your world, even YOU wouldn't make it.</p>
<p>i have two question for you, though, and forgive me if i'm wrong or misconstrue your ideas in anyway. are you saying that some of the students that yale accepts are not qualified in someway? should SATs and "pure academics" be the only measure of one's intelligence or qualifications?</p>