<p>I know we're only supposed to send in two teacher evals and one counselor letter, but can I send in more letters of rec? I already have one written from the people at National Student Leadership Conference, and I know it's vague because there were like 100 kids there but would it help or harm me more to end it in when I apply to Harvard this fall?
Thanks!</p>
<p>*send it in</p>
<p>If it will add substantially to your application, send it in. I believe Yale says it best:
</p>
<p><a href=“http://admissions.yale.edu/may-i-submit-supplementary-letters-recommendation”>http://admissions.yale.edu/may-i-submit-supplementary-letters-recommendation</a></p>
<p>No. Your guide who knew you for a few days, an employee from a dubious org – will add nothing to your file except perhaps show some naivete about your judgment.</p>
<p><a href=“Congratulations! You Are Nominated. It’s an Honor. (It’s a Sales Pitch.) - The New York Times”>Congratulations! You Are Nominated. It’s an Honor. (It’s a Sales Pitch.) - The New York Times;
<p>^^ Agreed. A GOOD letter would add substantially. A VAGUE letter will more likely dilute the quality of your entire package, the same way too much water spoils a batch of lemonade.</p>
<p>If you think your experience at the National Student Leadership Conference is important to your application - that you were chosen, or what you did/learned there - then highlight it elsewhere in your application. You can put it in your essay or a supplemental, list it in your ECs. If the letter is going to be vague, then you can do a better job of highlighting what you want the admissions committee to know by mentioning this activity elsewhere. </p>
<p>OP: the letter WILL be vague. And if you read the NYT article I linked, you’ll see that colleges won’t be blown away by the pedigree of that sort of program as well. I hope you had a great time but even a glowing note from your adult overseer isn’t going to move your piece forward on the chess board.</p>