<p>Shayna, there are valid points made by numerous posters. First, I suggest you read the link from Peabody here Peabody</a> Institute - Conservatory Admissions: The Double Degree Dilemma. It reinforces and clarifies some of the issues njcentconf addressed.</p>
<p>My son is a conservatory trained performing professional musician who opted out of a combined (music discipline) dual degree very late in the game. I will not pretend to offer advice concerning a premed path, as there are posters far more qualified than I to do so.</p>
<p>Music encompasses many directions and disciplines, and there is a major difference in approaches if your goal is an advanced avocational pursuit versus a performance track career path. </p>
<p>You need to identify and clarify your direction, and consider just where music fits in to your scheme of things in the long run. If you are contemplating a performance career, and have hopes of an orchestral chair, you have a long hard row to hoe. You need accurate, professional assessment of your skill level, talent, training and potential. There are numerous music options that may offer a high level of involvement, and a less rigorous path than a conservatory or conservatory level performance track.</p>
<p>UMich (Ann Arbor), Northwestern, Hopkins/Peabody, Rochester/Eastman. CW/CIM, Rice and Juilliard are conservatory level programs among the best in the country, and all are extremely competitive audition driven admits. Academic stats matter to varying degrees at each institution, and more so in a double degree program. Without knowing a bit more of your musical background, I would not venture a guess as to your competitiveness at any or all of these.</p>
<p>Quite simply, Stanford, Williams are not at the forefront of performance track choices. This is not said to denigrate their programs, as they serve many very well for specific musical pursuits. There are vast differences between BA and BM music tracks which you need to investigate and consider.</p>
<p>The Columbia/Juilliard program looks good on paper, as does the Harvard/NEC and Tufts/NEC cross programs. The reality is that the admit rates for these are low, normally less than a dozen in any year, and the attrition rate is high. The Eastman/Rochester as well as the Tufts/NEC programs have been said to be a logistical nightmare for some because of the travel/distance issues.</p>
<p>
[quote]
But as for majoring in music and taking the premed requirements, is there enough time to do that? It seems as though people doing one or the other are already having a tough time and trying to do both would just end up as mediocre accomplishment in both.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>A performance track BM is a time and credit intense degree program, as are most programs involving the applied sciences. You will find conflicts with labs, ensemble and ipo time slots and commitments. It is rarely if ever a four year path; it can range from 4 1/2 to 6 years depending on the individual and institution. Consider the financial aspects of added time.</p>
<p>Many of these points are discussed in depth in numerous threads within CC's music major forum. If nothing else, please read <a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/music-major/258796-so-you-want-music-major-one-family-s-experience.html%5B/url%5D">http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/music-major/258796-so-you-want-music-major-one-family-s-experience.html</a> for an overview in selecting and choosing a school for undergrad music pursuits.</p>
<p>For certain individuals, anything is possible. Neither path is for the undedicated or unmotivated. Think carefully, and identify your drive and passion, and your long term goals. Trying to combine both may not be the best course of action.</p>