<p>
</p>
<p>LOLOL WOW. Good job sounding like a 14-year-old girl.</p>
<p>Well if reading Cosmo doesn’t “stimulate” your mental/emotional state then what does it do? Maybe stimualte is too strong of a word but I can’t think of any other one. </p>
<p>And I never said Cosmo actually was all about sex. I said “If”. I thought I made it clear I was ignorant to the magazine and that I had never even opened one let alone read one. And I don’t plan on it. Me not wanting to read about it is just another instance of how guys don’t like to express themselves through words like women do. Those statements were all based on “if”. So my previous argument about Cosmo can’t be considered… I was obviously wrong. </p>
<p>Just for the record. I have no intentions of arguing and saying who’s right/wrong like manhattan. Simple discussion…</p>
<p>GoOakland - I don’t read cosmo. I don’t know what it does either. Also, probably the reason you don’t want to read it, is not because you don’t like to express yourself through words, but because you probably have little interest in tanning, ponytails, how to please a man and how to get famous like beyonce. Just a guess, lol.</p>
<p>but yeh the whole cosmo thing’s be beaten to a pulp.</p>
<p>Back to Woofles, and her question and concerns. My advice, run as fast as you can. Do not pass go. Do not look back. Get out now.</p>
<p>Pretty much everything is about sex these days…if you can’t see the connection you’re a eggnoramoose. Playboy and cosmopolitan are the same in that they are doorways for each gender to the same destination.</p>
<p>op is turning out to be more of a ■■■■■ than I thought so I think I’m done here.</p>