<p>Good feedback here. I’m hearing that a college student living at home might be scarce around the house — hadn’t even thought of that. But, with the likely Work-Study job (or other job), continued volunteering as required by her intended major/master’s programs, long hours on homework per those dang LDs, plus a RT commute, we might just become ships passing in the night. I definitely appreciate E’s detailed cautionary tale as well as others’ reports on how successful the live-at-home arrangement can be. Thanks! I’m moving out of the “shock & fear” phase. Moving on to adapt to one more variable in her college search/scenario: commuter student, living at home. All this feedback has helped me figure out where she/we might get into trouble, if she winds up living at home for financial reasons. </p>
<p>Re: TE. What I think I’m seeing is that when you participate in TE (and your kid is NOT a merit-magnet), in most cases, you assume you will not have to pay any tuition for four years. The TE replaces any “grants” or “scholarships” that the kid might otherwise be offered. The receiving school then can turn around and offer those goodies to another applicant. But, a TE family will have to pay everything else outside of tuition, based on your EFC/ESC (a reasonable expectation, it seems, in exchange for free tuition): room & board (for a residential student), books/tech, travel (if not commuting, or commuting costs if not traveling far to live at a school), and personal expenses. </p>
<p>For some idiotic reason, in the days before we really started overtly preparing to tap TE, I had always vaguely thought that our cash flow could cover those expenses. I wish our income could cover that, but hubby’s income has been eviscerated on and off during the recession in a dramatically changing industry, and then there were the extreme medical/education costs for a child with a disability. Hence the tapped out home equity. Now, we’re back in the saddle, but our 2014 income puts us in that weird doughnut hole (it seems — I’m still learning about all this), where a residential cost might just be too much. </p>
<p>Our financial planner has reviewed all kinds of options with us — from sell the house (yeah, no.), borrow from retirement fund, somehow get a full-ride (that includes room & board, right?), get second jobs (of course the kid will be working and borrowing the $5,500 etc.), to D16 as a commuter student. </p>
<p>Ok, if living at home needs to be an option for our kid, we will roll with it. Thanks for cluing me in. </p>
<p>This “newly discovered” possibility just hit me hard and exposed the deep assumption that I must have unconsciously been holding ever since the kid was born — that she’d go away to school and be leaving us at age 18. (Just like I did.) We had the same type of experience when we learned of her various disabilities when she was a young child — you sign up for parenthood thinking the default is whatever your experience or culture has seeded into your head, but then reality emerges and you’re like, “Whoa, what is that? That wasn’t in my plans!” Adjustment time!</p>
<p>She just started visiting colleges, and she/we have been asking about “commuter student life.” FYI: It’s a good baseline to see a really nice commuter student lounge — with lockers!</p>