Hello everyone!
I’ve noticed that some of my supplementary essays sound more like straight-up answers to the prompt and not a sophisticated essay. For example, here are Cornell and Dartmouth’s prompt:
Cornell: Tell us about an engineering idea you have, or about your interest in engineering. Describe how your ideas and interests may be realized by “and linked to” specific resources within the College of Engineering. Finally, explain what a Cornell Engineering education will enable you to accomplish.
Dartmouth: We believe it is critical that your candidacy reflect the interests, experiences and pursuits that are most important to you. To this end, is there anything else you would like us to know?
My responses are much more narration and expression of my viewpoint rather than how a particular experience has affected me. Do you think this approach is justified for these two prompts or should I work from another angle?
Any feedback would be much appreciated! Thank you in advance!