<p>One of the biggest drawbacks to applying ED is that you loose the opportunity to compare packages which can cost you money. </p>
<p>I can only talk to how it played out in our house…</p>
<p>During her admission cycle, my D was accepted to amherst, dartmouth, williams, barnard, tufts, bryn mawr and Mount Holyoke.</p>
<p>In the end, Dartmouth was her first choice but Williams gave a better FA package (we used the Williams offer as the basis of a financial review to get a better offer from Dartmouth). However, the Williams package was not the overall best package, we were just looking at 2 peer schools. </p>
<p>Williams gave more grant money, less loans ($0) and this was before they instituted their no loan policy (now gone again), a smaller student contribution, smaller work study obligation, and a smaller parent contribution than Dartmouth. </p>
<p>Dartmouth met Williams’ EFC, removed the loans, and met the grant aid. Though out her 4 years at Dartmouth, her financial aid remained pretty consistent to the point that she graduated with ~ 3k in loans (which she took out Jr. Year when she studied abroad in Europe).</p>
<p>Had my D applied ED to Dartmouth and received the exact package that she received RD, she would have graduated with ~ 20k in loans as she would have received loans in her FA package each of the 4 years.</p>
<p>There was a total of $12,256 between the Barnard package and the final offer we got from Dartmouth</p>
<p>Dartmouth EFC 2221 lower than barnard
student contribution 585 higher than barnard)
Dartmouth Grant money 7720 higher than barnard
loans 2600 less than barnard
work study 300 less than barnard
total 12256</p>
<p>The difference between Williams Financial aid package and the Amherst Financial aid package</p>
<p>parent contribution was 2251 higher at Amherst
student contribution 975 higher at Amherst
grant money 4906 lower at Amherst
loans 3500 higher at Amherst
Workstudy 100 higher at Amherst
11732 If all things would have remained consistent over her 4 years we would have had to come up with an extra $46,928</p>