<p>the phrase was “evidence shows that blah _____ blood pressure regulation”</p>
<p>“increasing” blood pressure regulation does not make sense; if you regulate more, then there would be no high blood pressure. But if you “impair” blood pressure regulation, then pressure is not in check and it can lead to hypertension.</p>
<p>funny, i put aggravated / something as the answer because of the word ‘regulation’</p>
<p>Oh ok,</p>
<p>I mistook it as _____ blood pressure not ________ bp regulation</p>
<p>So out of 19 SCs I got two wrong
Not bad in my book :)</p>
<p>hey guys do you know which writing section was experimental 1 or 5?
cause i skipped number 5. usually when do they tell you when it’s experimental online?</p>
<p>In Rocket Review Rev, Robinson said the exp is usually in the middle so its probably section 5 thats exp</p>
<p>which sucks because it was easy</p>
<p>Amazing job remembering all of those questions!
As of now you guys are only missing 6 more questions to complete the entire CR portion.
I am pretty sure we are missing questions on the passage about Chesnutt and the paragraph on what is natural.</p>
<p>How about the answer to the question where the line is extended from point b or something towards the right, downward. What point does it pass through? and the one where you have 3 lines, cut by a transversal and a+b=180?</p>
<p>^^ (7,-4) because slope is -3/2 or -2/3 i dont remember</p>
<p>I think this was the second-to-last question on a math section where they gave us a table of values for a function.
The question asked something about what is r if f(r) is equal to f( at something) - f (at something).
I believe the answer was 9.</p>
<p>What point does it pass through? and the one where you have 3 lines, cut by a transversal and a+b=180?</p>
<p>i don’t remember that one but that reminds me of a problem where they give you 40 degrees of one angle and 70 degrees of 2 angles and thorugh vertical angle theorem or w/e the answer is 30 degrees</p>
<p>Sorry was (7,-4) E?</p>
<p>dag the answer is 9 correcto</p>
<p>There was a question on the area of a trapezoid in a coordinate plane, but I cant remember the answer.</p>
<p>Yea the lines cut by the transversal was like one of the first ones maybe exper.?</p>
<p>I have a feeling yes^^^</p>
<p>Both of the Chesnutt/nature paragraphs only have 2 questions.
Probably one on Marta
And a few on the brain passage I’m not sure were even questions (like copernicus…surely they didnt repeat passage 2’s main idea of man being egocentric like 6x?)</p>
<p>In regards to the dualism - dignify question, I agree with rb’s analysis on why it should be added credibility to. However, I guarantee that the beginning of the next sentence (after the dignified sentence) stated verbatim “He also proposed” That was the primary reason why I chose “Descartes created dualism”…because it seemed like he mustve proposed the first idea (present in that topic sentence). </p>
<p>But, creation is not really a definition of dignify. So I’m fairly certain that it is “added credibility to”</p>
<p>What was that analyses of freeze thaw — answer?</p>
<p>There was also a question that said:
(x-3)(x+3)=0
What is the value of x^2?
Since this is a difference of squares I figured:
(x^2)-9=0
x^2=9</p>
<p>I was so sure the vaccine one was a bold statement! What he’s saying is good things might not necessarily be natural. What the author is trying to say is natural things may not always be good. Which are two different ideas…
And I thought “Vaccines ain’t” challenged the popular misconception that people actually think vaccines are natural so I put bold statement to challenge a popular misconception..</p>
<p>I agree with mathnerd and Echelon! get to updating!</p>
<p>for that last sentence completion with erroneous, i actually put prudent because it seemed to make more sense if you break down the sentence more. It went something like this, Without knowing that so and so was actually a woman, the admirer _______ sent her a mustache box.</p>
<p>If the admirer did not know that person was a woman, the admirer would not have been erroneous, the admirer would have been prudent in sending a mustache box. And this was the last sentence completion, it probably would not have been the most obvious. </p>
<p>Anyone else’s opinions?</p>