<p>i might be thinking too much, but this is what prudent means:</p>
<p>Careful in regard to one’s own interests, or exercising good judgment</p>
<p>If the admirer sent a mustache box, then the admirer would be prudent in that the admirer would be exercising good judgment based on what the admirer knows. I do remember the question sounded like it was asking for the word describing the admirers actions in that situation. And in that situation, the admirer thought that the person was a man, so the admirer did exercise good judgment. Paradoxical, but that’s what I thought. And this wasn’t one of the first questions, it was the last one so you can never be too sure.</p>
<p>Ok I get it now. I thought the assertion referred to the one made by the author, not Nash. But no one ever said things that aren’t natural are good, right? Nash is just supporting his/her own assertion that natural things can be bad with a counterexample that a good thing might not be natural.</p>
<p>And there was the one with the “curiosities” and “wonders” about the mind “not making it more correct” or something.. I don’t remember what I put..</p>
<p>For Math, what did you guys get on that question that said:</p>
<p>How many 2 digit numbers in the tens digit are greater than the units digit? or something like that</p>
<p>I remember I was doing the question and I finished it and thought I got the right answer but it wasn’t there so I skipped it but I forgot to go back.</p>