<p>was math also the same? o_____O</p>
<p>^i think so.. lol</p>
<p>collegeboard guys really need to retire....</p>
<p>I did it on Sunday and it wasn't the same..</p>
<p>yes because it was Sunday. the reason they did this nonsense was because they knew sunday kids wouldnt take a saturday paper</p>
<p>-9 = 690 means the curve was lenient. I think it is -3 = 800. In most exams -9 converts to 680. The math curve is also OK.</p>
<p>Yes Sunday kids wont take Saturday exams, but even then they used the art critic one twice in Sunday examination. First as an experimental section, and then as a real one. And they are apparently still "experimenting" it on us. Ridiculous!</p>
<p>this test is not a standarized test anymore</p>
<p>how can they use the same questions</p>
<p>Ok 1 to 2 can be okay but not all.</p>
<p>College board sucks!</p>
<p>Woohoo! At least the CR curve is gracious. :)</p>
<p>-9 = 690 isn't all that gracious. it's a pretty normal curve. we don't really know what it's like in the 700s region do we?</p>
<p>It is gracious. If you look through the scoring curves of previous administered tests you will find that -9 generally corresponds to 680. I found only one test in which -9 was 690, and that had a very generous curve. -3(raw score) =800. -5(raw score) =770. A normal curve has 760 for -4 (raw score).</p>
<p>that's good then =)</p>
<p>i'm hoping for something like -5 = 770. afaik i only know of 1 CR mistake so far, but i'm expecting up to five just in case.</p>
<p>If it is as the title of the thread, this is so unfair!</p>
<p>it is. but note one of my comments on this thread. overlaps are close to impossible and even then, people from november were not supposed to discuss.</p>
<p>Ah, in the May SAT, a -8 was 660. So if a -8 can produce a score in the vicinity of 700 this time, I am satisfied.</p>