<p>Yea I put based on such experiments too.</p>
<p>Can someone tell me what they put for the last question on section 10… the one thats about the Andes mountains. I was guessing between “requiring walking” and “and so it was required that they walked”</p>
<p>I put requiring walking, not sure though. There hasn’t been a clear answer put forth by someone yet. Both sounded awkward. I would have put “and so…” but I thought the “and” was unnecessary.</p>
<p>I left it as it is (A) and was between that and C. Apparently a lot of people believe the answer’s D, but I’m really not too sure. This one will be interesting to see.</p>
<p>@harvard1009 architecture was def experiemental</p>
<p>all of the ppl who had our version of the test, with a non-writing section, had paco and his shopping psychology as their paragraph correction</p>
<p>I believe the question with the Andes mountain had person in the answer because ‘they’ later in the question had no clear antecedent.</p>
<p>I put “and so must walk” because “requiring walking” violated parallelism with the verb in the clause before (“be broken” or something; don’t remember exactly).</p>
<p>can someone summarize the architecture paragraph? i don’t remember it, but it seems to be in the same section as the grocery paragraph…</p>
<p>what if i left all those questions blank…</p>
<p>I think that was exp so you’re ok.</p>
<p>No, they were in different sections. The architecture one was experimental, so you probably just didn’t get it.</p>
<p>Hmm…do you guys think -1 MC and 10 essay will be an 800 again?</p>
<p>“requiring walking” doesn’t work because the rules don’t require you to only be able to walk. It requires that you can’t use cars, which causes people to walk. It has strange syntax as well.</p>
<p>guys, what was teh asnwer to like Q. 30. It was the first question for the paragraph form stuff. It was like “We assume that it caused…” “we can assume that it caused…” “___, we assume, causes…”</p>
<p>anyone?</p>
<p>I made a change to it because it switched from present tense (the first sentence) to past tense (We assumed that it caused…) but I don’t remember what exactly the change was.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>probably beginning with divers–having in front of began implies past participle? so it should be begun?</p>
<p>CrzyGmer789X2, I did the same thing for that sentence. The correct answer was “A smile, we assume, corresponds to a particular emotion” or something like that. If the sentence remained in past tense, it didn’t match the rest of the paragraph.</p>
<p>i picked “being that in the beginning…”</p>
<p>how many no error’s did you guys have?</p>
<p>for the identifying errors part</p>
<p>did anyone have like four no changes in the last writing section?</p>
<p>for which ones did you have ne?</p>