<p>backfing has demonstrated how ■■■■■■■ should behave.</p>
<p>^lol good one.</p>
<p>@121212
I know it won’t help but I had experimental math and I had that question.</p>
<p>can anybody answer this: if a guy wants to be, lets say, a physicist, why the effing hell does he need to score good on sucky english comprehensions to get into a good college?
i cant imagine anything which sucks more than the CR section.</p>
<p>@qwerty11
Try the university enterance exam of my country;
Even if you want to be a physicist, you have to be good at Turkish literature and linguistics, mathematics (including calculus but you will need it for physics anyway), advanced geometry (way past pythagorean theorem), biology, chemistry, geography and history.</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>but from all of them you learn something. what do you learn from the CR section? like vocab? nothing else, just vocab.</p>
<p>guys does it seem ridiculous to get perfect scores on timed sections of math at home but to make awkward,careless.DAMN,mistakes at tests :(:(:(</p>
<p>not at all. lets kill the guy who had the ingenious idea of inventing the SAT.</p>
<p>@qwerty11
You’re right about that, learning vocab that you won’t use in the future seems ridiculus but the exam I am talking about is so extensive that it is also ridiculus to study for them in so much depth.</p>
<p>So, both systems suck. :)</p>
<p>i wonder if there exists an educational system that does not suck.</p>
<p>SAT originally used mainly by colleges and universities in the north-eastern United States, and developed by Carl Brigham, one of the psychologists who worked on the Army Alpha and Beta tests, the SAT was originally developed as a way to eliminate test bias between people from different socio-economic backgrounds.</p>
<p>It was first used in 1901. :)</p>
<p>^^ let’s kill that guy 
or take him out of his grave and rekill him :D;)</p>
<p>bwahahaha…thats IRONIC. the fact that it was supposed to eliminate the bias.</p>
<p>just blow up his grave i say. or shoot his tombstone.</p>
<p>Did anybody put “fairs and markets in urban areas”
to the question “which most undermines the argument of author 2?”</p>
<p>
It 100% wasn’t, it was in section 3 which had the grid-ins. A) The experimental was section 6, and B) The math experimental didn’t have grid-ins anyway.
The question I’m talking about is the same one lordofcenturies is, where you extend the segment beyond C and have to find the angle. Answer’s either 25 or 30.</p>
<p>At any rate I have an 800 on the math previously so it doesn’t really matter if I got it right, but I was astounded that a #5 question had me baffled when all the others were insanely easy and I was finishing 5-10 minutes before time on the math sections. It’s kind of bugging me :P</p>
<p>@Knuffles yeah; my reasoning that urbanization can bring a community together.</p>
<p>pardon
incorporate
aplomb
propitiate
opacity
licentious
aprophos-anguish
critical-physical
auspicious
fortitude-inspired
noxious
antecedent
impasse
affable-craven
benefit-flourish
somethin about ‘attempted to satisfy everyone but in consequence made nobody happy’ </p>
<p>I HAVE A QUESTION!!!</p>
<p>vocalization (whale question?people say)
loner
mentor-fledgling</p>
<p>were these from the dummy sections? anyone remember these?</p>
<h2>then what were they about?</h2>
<h2>what question had the "historial context"answer?(the folktale passage)</h2>
<h2>does anyone remember the egyptian cats questions??</h2>
<h2>the “realm” question with answer choices anxiety, security…etc</h2>
<p>the “design life” question, what was the answer?</p>
<p>I think the answer of “undermines the author” of the passage about architecture is “the house were built where three generations of the family live” or sth lyk dat,
cuz the author mentions that the modern buildings are built only to sustain for a short time.
Personal</p>
<p>hey y’all
any more discussion for math?</p>