November SAT discussions (international)

<p>Also there was a question with intersecting three lines or four(?). the degree value of three angles was given, we had to find sum of the other three angles. I got 210.</p>

<p>I think the range question was 0<x<7</p>

<p>For the one in f(a) where we had to give the range of a was the answer 0<a<7</p>

<p>yea. Find the first term of 6 terms that were increasing by 10. The sum of the six was given to be 360. The first and the least term was 35.</p>

<p>Plz discuus math questions the the thread that sais november 2009 math and not here</p>

<p>A man was both 15th from front and 7 from back. There were 21 people in the line.</p>

<p>@richardt92
The moderators said that we should rather have one international thread only.
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/667484-november-2009-sat-discussions-format.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/667484-november-2009-sat-discussions-format.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Yep,21 :wink:
10 char</p>

<p>range btw 0 and 7 . and ok lets discuss math :P</p>

<p>Let’s try to remember then.</p>

<p>there was a question of a circle graph . calls recieved by city something like that. the question was exactly “what percent recieved 2 calls or fewer calls”. i didn’t take into consideration the part that said no calles recieved because the question asks for recieved calls. anny suggestions</p>

<p>Does anyone remember the writing question with
students flocked around the teacher to ask questions, for which there had not been enough time? What did you put for this one?</p>

<p>Oh yeah, I considered the percentage with no calls at all because it asked for the percentage of households who received 2 or fewer calls. zero calls is included in 2 or fewer?</p>

<p>I think you should have taken it into consideration because 0 calls is fewer than 2</p>

<p>I considered 0 calls as well.</p>

<p>Bilguun I think I put no error to this one.I just couldnt see where there could be an error</p>

<p>For the writing one i chose the “had not been” one.</p>

<p>maybe i donno , anyways -1 is till acceptable</p>

<p>for the question with a hexahedron which was painted with black and white. Two views of it were shown. The correct answer was E because there couldn’t have been two adjacent white sides.</p>

<p>I put “for which” as an error. I dunno but it seemed incorrect because I wanted it to say “for whom”.</p>