<p>@kendoll222- we were talking about different problems, sorry. yeah i got E for that one i think.
do you remember the one that was like “x is proportional to y. y is inversely proportional to z.”
yeah, the answer was E) 162</p>
<p>i put humor because i couldnt really think of the “undesirable situation”</p>
<p>yes for impart knowledge.</p>
<p>and the theory one i put, i think the first one?
widespread but inexplicable?</p>
<p>Sen Com:
wouldnt believe anything else… implicit?</p>
<p>she viewed it as common sense that was innately wrong. but now that i think of it that mihgt be the answer to a different question about that passage… but i know that she viewed the impetus law as false because it is completely false, as newton later proved</p>
<p>I said “surprised”. Did anyone have the question about the actor who walked with a swagger offstage (vocab), and authors dueling over the origin of invention, or was that the experimental CR?</p>
<p>Ironic to underscore a serious event or something like that- it wasn’t really ironic though, and if it had been underscoring a serious event, then the author of passage 2 would be in support of it</p>
<p>and i chose humor too- the undesirable event- a child that actually responds in woofs seemed too literal to be taken into account- especially in context</p>
<p>did anyone get drone for a fill in? something like So and so was very _____: never showing appreciation for blah blah blah.</p>
<p>impromptu and vexed? oh and inert?</p>
<p>it was “ironic to underscore ____________” (it wasn’t a serious event)</p>
<p>i put ironic but I can’t remember the full choice</p>
<p>well the passage began with an ambivalent tone. it didnt take a stance at first and then mocked the idea by equating treating children like dogs, so thats where i got ironic. the point she was trying to underscore would be the validity of the theory of animal behavior.
flippancy fits to though, so i had a hard time deciding</p>
<p>Is “surprised” the answer for “research shows that even a college physics student blah blah blah”? I was confused between surprised and predictable …</p>
<p>And there was a comparison question like “more ambivalent” “more anecdotal” “more blah blah”… Any idea? Totally forgot the passage tho.</p>
<p>I definitely had the bullets and proportionality question, but I think that was the hard section I was hoping was experimental.</p>
<p>I put ironic for dolphins in the end, but I was pretty torn between that and flippant.</p>
<p>Skorpius I had both inert and vexed!</p>
<p>Confused: for college physics student I put predictable…cause she was saying a lot of people don’t know this, for example (example of all the people who don’t know this) college physics students. But that one was tough. And for “more…” I had more abstract. Anecdotal would’ve been the other passage.</p>
<p>yeah i got surprised to: after taking a year of college physics, you would expect a student to be able to illustrate the basic concept of gravity as always pointing downwards, but they still draw the trajectory wrong</p>
<p>But Ken, underscoring means simply to make evident or to stress something- stressing the the validity of the theory sort of means supporting it, which the author didn’t do</p>
<p>Firered, the section with the bullet (math) was experimental. CR: The answers were (pretty certain about all of them, CR is a strong suit for me) surprising, ironic, wrong but inherently plausible, ingrate (not drone), panache (actor swagger), vexed, impromptu, and comedy as a defense (not flippancy). Flippancy denotes disrespect which might sound plausible however I remember thinking that comedy as a defense fit much better. Of course I could be wrong for some of the passage ones, but am fairly certain that I am not. The sentence completion answers I offered are all correct. Other SC answers included somnolence…thrive, sonorous, doctor…altruistic.</p>
<p>c/ped from other thread</p>
<p>for the one with a hexagon asking for the x-coord of point v i got 8
(x+a)(x+b) and a graph what is the value of a and b if a<b i got -2 and 3
the parallel lines where y=30 asking for x+(another variable) i think i got 60 but i don’t think that’s right.
two parallel lines and a traingle it was similar and the base was 7 and one of the sides was 1.5 and it asked you to find the entire side i think i got 4 or 4.5? couldn’t do that one.
crit. reading: present an analogy but then retract it for another view?
writing: three-four no errors</p>
<p>confused93
i had a really tough time with that.
i crossed out all of the below:
more ambivalent
more anecdotal
less humorous
less direct
and went with whatever remaining choice was left</p>
<p>Also, what was the answer for the response of the guy from Boston (grand canyon passage) one? I put that view was better than he expected… totally zoned out during this passage haha</p>
<p>is the parallel line triangle question from experimental? answer was 35, but u used 55 in it somewhere?</p>
<p>which writing section was the experimental: the one discussing “clueless” or the one with langston hughes? i hope it was the former, that one was far more difficult.</p>