November SAT test A Thread

<p>i got inert and surprised and vexed.
i put more abstract for that one @confused93.
and at @kendoll222- it was ingrate.</p>

<p>Yeah, That question was confusing for me too. Don’t even remember what I put as an answer…</p>

<p>More abstract was my choice as well…Whoever asked, the Langston Hughes was not experimental, just as you hoped :)</p>

<p>TheMisunderstood
ah! that is what i was looking for. i was between drone and ingrate and went with ingrate but could not remember the word.
and yes, looking back comedy does make sense now. i put panache as well. and sonorous and doctor…altruistic.
i remember looking for thrive in a second word but can not remember the quesiton or what i chose</p>

<p>comedy…you mean humor for defense?</p>

<p>does anyone remember any of the questions from the passage we had to fix or correct? something about a queen and how her father was a tabuard. and then “the point of view of the lady…”?</p>

<p>yes humor for defense, and the thrive question was somnolence…thrive regarding koalas who are often drowsy but this characteristic allows them to survive on limited diets</p>

<p>^haha same same.
i was about to to drone or B…
then i thought of like ingrateful-> ingrate. lol</p>

<p>ahhh what was the 55, 35 triangle question??</p>

<p>and what question was the ironic one?</p>

<p>Ken that was experimental…the writing paragraph that we had to revise was regarding books and their movie representations</p>

<p>The boston guy is “the typical tourist”, and he’s happy if the Grand Canyon matches his expectations. It’s also ironic that he took the picture upon arriving instead of looking around first, since it propagates the expectations of the Canyon.</p>

<p>ah so could have the same main ones but different experimentals…</p>

<p>Sorry I don’t remember the triangle question you are referring to. Also, I did not know ingrate before the test but reasoned (SAT style) that ingrate correlates to ungrateful haha. So fortunate</p>

<p>55,35, triangle-- it was two parallel lines and an isosceles triangle with the high angle of 70 degrees</p>

<p>and from 55 how do you get 35?
@the misundertood- same!</p>

<p>does anyone remember other answer choices for the ironic one?</p>

<p>Yes spk you are correct</p>

<p>wait for the experimental writing what was the passage about? i dont remember it at all and am not panicking i think i skipped it…</p>

<p>u had to subtract 55 from 90 to get x…was that question experimental or not :/</p>

<p>literally you just made me so happy! there were so many errors in it i didnt understand what it was trying to convey</p>

<p>why from 90? wasnt the x an internal degree?</p>

<p>why are there two different versions!? T_T</p>