<p>Just saw this article that seems interesting. S has noticed similar research cuts hitting our local State flagship. Not sure how/if federal cuts are impacting schools like NU?</p>
<hr>
<p>Mar 4, 2013, 10:30am PST
UC Berkeley finds federal sugar daddy as unreliable as the state was
Steven E.F. Brown Web Editor- San Francisco Business Times</p>
<p>Just a year ago, the University of California, Berkeley, decided to try and replace vanishing state funding with money from the U.S. government. And how has that worked out?</p>
<p>Federal funding for its research is down already by $50 million for the first two quarters of its fiscal year due to “federal budget uncertainties.” And the sequester cuts will hurt even more.</p>
<p>Over the last decade, UC Berkeley has shifted from a primarily state-funded school to a federal-funded one, getting much of its roughly $400 million in grants from the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.</p>
<p>Even though not all of that $50 million drop in funding is tied to sequester cuts, the climate in Washington hasn’t helped, with politicians playing chicken with the U.S. budget.</p>
<p>Cal warned that the biggest effect of sequester cuts will be loss of jobs, saying “any loss in federal research dollars will mean lost jobs. As sequestration translates into fewer federal grants, the campus will be forced to hire fewer researchers.”</p>
<p>Although the cuts will eventually hit financial aid programs, those effects will be delayed, the university said.</p>
<p>U.S. government contracts and grants make up about 18 percent of UC Berkeley’s campus revenue.</p>
<p>[UC</a> Berkeley finds federal sugar daddy as unreliable as the state was - San Francisco Business Times](<a href=“http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/2013/03/uc-berkeley-finds-federal-sugar-daddy.html]UC”>http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/2013/03/uc-berkeley-finds-federal-sugar-daddy.html)</p>