<p>10
arrow to North East
100 N
37 degrees
5 N/m
7.38 east kgm/s
98 W
I just drew some curves…they only asked for shape
arrow up
energy lost to friction during production of electrical energy
15
2.5
displacement
24 ohms
14 ohms
2.5 watts
3.53<em>10^18 electrons?
.0023
pluto more mass
20 N
49 N
.41
2.85</em>10^-18 J
6.63<em>10^-18 J
3.45</em>10^-18 J
energy, momentum</p>
<p>I have multiple choice answers as well. I stored mine in matrix</p>
<p>@jamesjunkers your’e right on the fact that Fe has to be exerted on electrons but doesn’t that formula (E=Fe/ q) neglect any air resistance or friction force moving opposite the electron so doesn’t that mean a electron could still have a field if moving at constant speed?</p>
<p>@patrickod4 I think I put -1e</p>
<p>@patrickod4 i think i put -1</p>
<p>@fr3ih3it what did you put for last question</p>
<p>@Howdyyall IDK what Regents you were taking because the question in NO way ever mentioned the moon… It was only Charon, Pluto, and the Sun and I put that Pluto has more mass than Charon.</p>
<p>i put +1e bc it said antibaryon bc when you add the charges its -1e</p>
<p>@krauser126 charon is a moon.</p>
<p>@patrickod4 energy, momentum. I figure…law of conservation etc etc. and then conservation of momentum in collision. </p>
<p>Its -1e.</p>
<p>would speed be incorrect for the last question?</p>
<p>i think it’s -1 e because -2/3 + -2/3 + 1/3 is -1. You wouldn’t reverse what you already have, because then you might as well be adding up up down (+2/3, +2/3, -1/3)</p>
<p>For the Pluto and chafron question, would the sun have a greater gravitational force on Pluto because it’s closer to Pluto than it is to Chafron?</p>
<p>Someone should start a question and answer document similar to the one that was started for the English regents. </p>
<p>@DAIMYO but how can’t it be nuclear??</p>
<p>@rdward96
Im not sure because if charon is orbitting pluto, then at some point in the orbit, charon is between the sun and pluto. But it might be orbitting in a different direction, so not sure. </p>
<p>No distance didnt play a role because distance from sun for charon and pluto was basically the same. Force was dependent on the masses, so pluto had the greater force.</p>
<p>Nuclear doesnt make sense.</p>
<p>for the multiple choice question with the 2 kg object that was 3m above earths surface…what was the gravitational field strength…i put 9.8 N/kg</p>
<p>@rdward96 that’s what i put</p>
<p>what did you guys get for the graph question with the combination of vertical and horizontal velocities? was it 8m/s for both?</p>
<p>@singgus I put 8m/s for both too, not sure if that’s right :</p>