<p>Sharkshockey, cross off any words that you can see don’t fit right off the bat. Then try to look at the roots of the words that are left over and see if you can find similarities to words you do know. Ex, I managed to guess the word “verisimilitude” on a practice test because I recognized the similarity to veritaserum, the truth telling potion from Harry Potter :)</p>
<p>Would have* skipped them. “Would of” is not grammatically correct and should be replaced with would have or would’ve. This is very important on the writing section because I have seen some questions like that on the sat before.</p>
<p>I was referring to @sat2014 when he said he would of skipped them.</p>
<p>GOOD LUCK EVERYONE! 
</p>
<p>YESSSSS GOOD LUCK TO US ALL
WE’LL ALL GET 2400+!</p>
<p>It wasnt that bad! The supplemental was so obvious</p>
<p>There was one this morning. The moderators must have taken it down!!! </p>
<p>Did you have math, reading or writing for your supplemental?</p>
<p>That was… really easy…</p>
<p>Anyone remember that circles question?</p>
<p>the answer was pi</p>
<p>What was the question?</p>
<p>That was so good</p>
<p>The one where two circles overlapped and the shaded area between them was equal to the area of 1/6th the larger circle and 1/4th the smaller circle. It asked you to find the ratio of the radii. What was the answer?</p>
<p>I think it was A, don’t remember completely tho</p>
<p>he didn’t ask to find any ratios … he asked to find area of shaded area … it was pi</p>
<p>the answer was radical 2 and radical 3</p>
<p>I think it was A too…if I remember correctly A was root 3 to root 2</p>
<p>Yep</p>
<p>How did you solve it?</p>