<p>CAN WE POSY A COMPILATION??? its getting hard to follow</p>
<p>i still stand on immediately understandable. I can see how its wrong but I still think its the better answer out of the two debatable answers.</p>
<p>Lemonio: If you ordered the QAS you will find out soon enough about the understandable v. enhanced question.</p>
<p>I agree with cs that understandable was the better option. Neither are perfect though, I will admit.</p>
<p>did you read the passage? artificially enhanced really had nothing to do with anything… it wasn’t of importance to the narrator that the image was artificially enhanced, but that they were there, and apparent. i agree that the answer is shaky, but its certainly not artificially enhanced, and while i don’t remember the other choices… i do recall that being a pretty easy elimination.</p>
<p>does QAS release the question for october?</p>
<p>i wanted to order it last time i took the sat and it said that for this month they do not provide the questions…
biofuels was exprimental</p>
<p>to me…especially after reading the whole article not just the passage…it seems painfully obvious that it is artificially enhanced
nevertheless i will not be able to convince you all because of the misleading instantly apparent phrase so i will quit arguing
pretty sure i got an 800 in CR but i’ve already gotten 3 wrong on math…so i’m gonna go cry on the math thread</p>
<p>On the geology, can someone answer it up when it comes to between</p>
<p>'creates a sense of foreboding vrs historical speculation '</p>
<p>‘the precursor to future science vrs application in modern technology’ </p>
<p>I put foreboding and precursor to future science. I think the first was more a rhetorical application of a historically speculating question that’s larger purpose in the passage was to create a sense of foreboding, although that could be breaking the tenet of reading too much into the passage…</p>
<p>Same with the second one, perhaps these are questions of how literally you read the passage.</p>
<p>are any of these experimenta l sentence completion: the camper admonish one, the crystalize/ synthesis one, and the hobble one</p>
<p>ok, i asked my bro who had math experimental.</p>
<p>he had nikhil, publishing girl (with friends in Peace Corps), biofuels was writing, napping, geologist, women artist… not sure about indians though (what was that one about)</p>
<p>not sure on any of the vocab, but i dont even remember the crystallize</p>
<p>i also remembered another CR passage - negative campaigning</p>
<p>also, one of the CRs had 23 and one had 25 questions</p>
<p>“there was a question about what he found fascinating about the mercator projection.
the answer was teh usefulness of it in modern technology”</p>
<p>Is this true? I remember trying to find something on how it was useful but there was absolutely no information regarding it. All the information pointed to the irony of something from 400 years ago being used for something today.</p>
<p>“that repetition in ceremonial texts is NOT an aid to memory (e)”</p>
<p>why didnt it show how important the ceromonial texts are? I thought that because these texts were sooo important, they wouldnt forget</p>
<p>cross teh uni - i put the quoted answer. i thought it was saying that the process stood the test of time and was still applicable to modern stuff</p>
<p>mabsjen - passage was saying that indians didnt need repetition to remember -> they were programmed w/ good memory.</p>
<p>who got the answer for that one about the moon picture, and why was it not all being geology are something. I put the answer down it was on a POV from a geologist or something.</p>
<p>I didn’t put “admiration” for the biography of an artist one.</p>
<p>The author was discussing how Giotto got discovered, then said something to the effect of “some don’t have the benefit of sheep, but the situation is similar,” and then did the Michelangelo example. So, I thought that it was drawing a comparison between the two discoveries, only Michelangelo didn’t have sheep. Also, the text really only detailed Giotto’s discovery and nothing of his master’s admiration afterward.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Thats what I put too. Think about it. The passage argued that repetition wasn’t key to remembering but that one sentence said that they wouldn’t forget the tests because the events were very important in their daily lives. So, the sentence implies that ceremonial texts play a large role in many Native Americans’ lives.</p>
<p>can we compile a list of answers…debatable or not?</p>
<p>bmsa - i was back and forth between c and e. I went with c (doesnt show detail) b/c the passsage kept saying how distant the earth was. could be e though (not through eyes of geo)</p>
<p>jas - i put admiration b/c the guy didnt have any reason to praise the lil shepherd (it might have not even been good), he just was impressed w/ the work</p>
<p>129 - i still the overall message was indians dont need repition in words -> they have good memories</p>
<p>what is the story about something like a great artist talking about? i don’t get it.</p>
<p>Bmsa- i’m pretty sure it was E because the passage made a little reference to “asethetics” a sentence later, which was also part of the answer choice for the geologists having different asthetics.</p>
<p>@sixstring91. Yeah, now I remember now, it was E thats the one I put down, I narrowed it down between C& E as the two, but I went with E as my final answer on that one. It was too damn close to pick between those two, you know.</p>